1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 16, 2020. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Is this really the best name? Jdorje 06:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
I boldly moved it to 1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane, as damage was heavy in both Florida and Cuba. âŹâ© Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Obviously, I have been expanding this article. Hopefully, it will receive GA status when I am finished. Currently, I am expanding the preparations section. I have one question regarding the prose of the sentence in bold.
"58 warnings and advisories were issued by the U.S. Weather Bureau during the nine day period when the storm impacted the western Caribbean islands and United States.[2] In Miami, watches and warnings were broadcast via microphones at two to three-hour intervals when the hurricane threatened the state. The Red Cross reported 35,000 people were sheltered during the storm, which accounted for a small portion of those whom evacuated.[2] 150 small vessels were secured in Key West, while operational Army and Navy planes were transferred from Florida to safer airfields. In Cuba, communications were severed on the Isles of Pines, though Havana received ample warnings and was well prepared for the storm.[4]"
Do you think it is gramatically correct? Additionally, do you believe the first sentence is too long?
Thanks in advance. CVW ( talk) 01:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
I was going to see if someone else would review this. But it's been more than two weeks and no takers yet. So I guess I will review this now-- 12george1 ( talk) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
That should be it. Nice work overall-- 12george1 ( talk) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
fn 105, "Cuban Relief is Planned". St. Petersburg Times (88). St. Petersburg, Florida. Associated Press. October 20, 1944. p. 8. Retrieved June 24, 2019 â via Newspapers.com., but the link is actually "Pepper Asks OPA, WPB Action in Citrus Loss" from Tampa Bay Times, same with fn 107. -- Jarodalien ( talk) 16:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 16, 2020. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Is this really the best name? Jdorje 06:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
I boldly moved it to 1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane, as damage was heavy in both Florida and Cuba. âŹâ© Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Obviously, I have been expanding this article. Hopefully, it will receive GA status when I am finished. Currently, I am expanding the preparations section. I have one question regarding the prose of the sentence in bold.
"58 warnings and advisories were issued by the U.S. Weather Bureau during the nine day period when the storm impacted the western Caribbean islands and United States.[2] In Miami, watches and warnings were broadcast via microphones at two to three-hour intervals when the hurricane threatened the state. The Red Cross reported 35,000 people were sheltered during the storm, which accounted for a small portion of those whom evacuated.[2] 150 small vessels were secured in Key West, while operational Army and Navy planes were transferred from Florida to safer airfields. In Cuba, communications were severed on the Isles of Pines, though Havana received ample warnings and was well prepared for the storm.[4]"
Do you think it is gramatically correct? Additionally, do you believe the first sentence is too long?
Thanks in advance. CVW ( talk) 01:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1944 CubaâFlorida hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 12george1 ( talk · contribs) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
I was going to see if someone else would review this. But it's been more than two weeks and no takers yet. So I guess I will review this now-- 12george1 ( talk) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
That should be it. Nice work overall-- 12george1 ( talk) 03:38, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
fn 105, "Cuban Relief is Planned". St. Petersburg Times (88). St. Petersburg, Florida. Associated Press. October 20, 1944. p. 8. Retrieved June 24, 2019 â via Newspapers.com., but the link is actually "Pepper Asks OPA, WPB Action in Citrus Loss" from Tampa Bay Times, same with fn 107. -- Jarodalien ( talk) 16:25, 8 May 2020 (UTC)