1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane is part of the 1933 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 30, 2013 Good article nominee Listed December 16, 2013 Good topic candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on August 23, 2023.
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance). United States: Delaware Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

It's close to B class, but there's too many spelling errors and grammar mistakes. Also, some places go into too much unneeded detail (like Isabel in the statistics section, should be merged with impact), while other places don't have enough detail (impact in general, there's probably more for Mid-Atlantic and northward). -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Cant then the impact section will make no sense if you merge it. Is better to keep comparisons with the 1933 storm and the Isabel separate otherwise it will confuse the reader. Impacts of the actual storm and comparisons should be kept separate. (see; 2005 Atlantic hurricane seasonstorms). Storm05 12:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC) reply

What about the intro, then? Hurricanehink ( talk) 12:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC) reply

What intro?, theres nothing wrong with the intro (which is irrelvent to this discurssion). Storm05 12:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I did a general copyedit. Storm05 13:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC) reply

No, I meant put the Isabel comparisons in the intro, if anywhere. There's no need to have a section comparing two storms. A lot of storms were similar, and yet don't have a comparisons section. Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Should the title be moved to 1933 Chesapeake-Potomac hurricane, per the link in the first sentence, as well as necessitating the de-capitalized "h" in "hurricane? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

In the section North Carolina and Virginia the figures quoted do not seem to match the referenced NOAA page. It seems that either another reference is needed, or that the article needs to be adjusted to match the reference. Example: Article states that 18 were killed and $10 million dollars [in damage] (presumably in NC and VA, since that's the section title), but the NOAA reference states that "fewer than 18 perished" and "tens of millions of dollars of damage," and more importantly, the NOAA reference seems to refer to the storm's total deaths and damages, not just NC and VA. Another example: the article states that Richmond sustained $250,000 in damage, but this is nowhere in the reference. The only "$250,000" in the reference is to a county in Maryland. Matt Roberson ( talk) 04:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC) reply

This storm's name is Original Research unless a link is given that provides it.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 16:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC) reply

It's name is from a Weatherwise article from a decade ago written by a member of TPC. If you'd like, we can look it up. Thegreatdr 16:38, 15 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Something is very wrong with that number, unless people in 1933 were truly that poor. The reference itself says that was one person's contribution. Thegreatdr 20:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC) reply

It was right after the great depression.... and dont forget inflation also. Wxweenie91 18:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Didn't we decide it's supposed to be 1933 Chesapeake Potomac hurricane? Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 15:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC) reply

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

• "wb" :
  • WeatherBook [http://www.weatherbook.com/hurricane1933.html The Chesapeake/Potomac Hurricane of August 23, 1933]URL Accessed: [[July 27]], [[2006]]
  • [http://www.weatherbook.com/hurricane1933.html The Chesapeake/Potomac Hurricane of August 23, 1933]
• "hc" :
  • [http://www.hurricanecity.com/city/oceancity.htm hurricanecity.com]
  • [http://www.hurricanecity.com/city/oceancity.htm hurricanecity.com]. URL Accessed. [[July 27]], [[2006]]

DumZiBoT ( talk) 06:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.redcross.org/article/0,1072,0_507_1772,00.html
  • In 1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane on 2011-05-25 03:05:04, 404 Not Found
  • In 1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane on 2011-06-02 12:15:12, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 12:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheAustinMan ( talk · contribs) 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing 1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane using a top-to-bottom format that hints at all issues within the article. TheAustinMan^{( Talk· Works)} 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Review Bot Checks

• Dablinks – No disambiguations
• Checklinks – No dead or questionable links
• Automatic peer reviewer – No errors. Good work!

Lead

• You ought to try a more interesting opening sentence. The current one is a boring boilerplate, and should, again, be changed to something more interesting. This was a high impacting tropical cyclone that struck the East Coast of the United States, after all.
  • Agreed, changed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "Advanced warning allowed hundreds of people to evacuate ahead of the hurricane making landfall in northeastern North Carolina on August 23 with winds of about 90 mph (150 km/h)." – Try splitting this sentence up. You introduce a tidbit about the scale of hurricane evacuation and then plop in information about landfall location and intensity.
  • Split. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "Similarly heavy damage occurred in Maryland, mostly from crop damage." – 'Heavy damage', mostly from 'crop damage'. A bit redundant, since damage is, well, damage. It would've worked if you had a damage totaled followed by 'mostly from crop damage' but in this case you don't. Try mixing it up so you don't have to indicate that crop damage accounted for a lot of damage, which sounds strange.
  • Added total for crops. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "In Canada, heavy rainfall assisted firefighters,..." – Clarify. I know it sounds almost like common sense, but how did the rains help the firefighters? Were they suddenly thirsty, so the rains helped satisfy their thirst? Certainly not, but, alas, please clarify. It would be helpful if you included where in particular as well. Canada is pretty big. TheAustinMan^{( Talk· Works)} 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Ugh, I explained :P --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Meteorological history

• Just a general note. For such a long lasting hurricane, the meteorological history seems pretty short. Are you sure that was it?
  • It was 1933, and the storm did have a pretty boring path. Originally the Weather Bureau didn't begin advisories til it was a C4. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "While the hurricane continued to the northwest, the eye briefly moved over Norfolk, Virginia, for the first time since the 1821 Norfolk and Long Island hurricane." – You should try to clarify this. The sentence indicates that the eye of this particular hurricane crossed Norfolk for the first time since 100+ years ago. You should do some sentence shaping to indicate that it was the first time that the eye of a hurricane passed directly over Norfolk.
  • Not exactly, but I tweaked it. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Link Maine. TheAustinMan^{( Talk· Works)} 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Why? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Preparations and impact

• "In Norfolk, Virginia, most ships either remained at port due to advanced warning." – Either remained at port or...?
  • Fixed, added the "either". --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Link Cape Hatteras.
  • Done. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "Along the coast, the United States Coast Guard rescued more than 200 people, many of whom due to capsized boats." – Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'many of whom due to' sounds very strange. Perhaps a rewording may be required.
  • IDK, I could just remove "of whom". Would that work? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "The Potomac in Alexandria was at the highest level since 1899,..." → 'the highest' to 'its highest'
  • Mokay. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• Link Old Town to Old Town Alexandria.
  • Didn't know it existed, thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "Rainfall in Atlantic City totaled 8.12 in (206 mm), including 2.25 in (57 mm) that fell in an hour on August 20, which was the monthly average." – You should say something along the lines of the rainfall from (these days) was equivalent to the average totals for the entire month, instead of saying the rainfall is the average, which is somewhat odd.
  • I'm not sure what you're saying. 2.25 inches was the average monthly rainfall, according to the source I had. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "The storm spawned a tornado in Wildwood." → Was there any damage?
  • The source says "causing additional damage", but no specifics. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply
• "Heavy rainfall in the state increased levels along streams, causing one person to drown at Mount Tremper." → Should specify water levels, and not just any levels. Walter Creek leveled up! TheAustinMan^{( Talk· Works)} 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Agreed, heh. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Other sections

• Nope. Good work! TheAustinMan^{( Talk· Works)} 22:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks! Replied all around. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 01:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1933 Chesapeake–Potomac hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140210221648/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/All_U.S._Hurricanes.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/All_U.S._Hurricanes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply