A fact from 1913 Great Meteor Procession appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2010 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that on February 9, 1913, a procession of fireballs seen across Canada to Brazil likely represented the break-up of a short-lived natural satellite of the Earth? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/August.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 9, 2012, February 9, 2013, February 9, 2015, February 9, 2022, and February 9, 2023.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Hi, great article! ;-) According to this (based on a Nassau Guardian newspaper article), there is an account of this event in OCLC  0140044833 (Celestial passengers : UFO's and space travel] by Margaret Sachs, with Ernest Jahn) Probably not worth an interlibrary loan. John Vandenberg ^{( chat)} 22:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Judging by the book's title, it may be the case that they are talking about the event as represented by Charles Hoy Fort in his book New Lands (end of ch. 23). Fort often takes interesting historic astronomical data and places an, er, unusual interpretation on it: "If one will think that they were meteors, at least one will have to think that no such meteors had ever been seen before". Svejk74 ( talk) 07:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply

• [1]
• [2]
• Davidson, M, (November?) 1913 "British Astronomical Journal" (probably Journal of the British Astronomical Association, which I don't have access to); possibly volume 24 pp. 101-8
• 1939 article by Wylie, mentioned in the article

John Vandenberg ^{( chat)} 23:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply