| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1314–1316 papal conclave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | 1314–1316 papal conclave was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 15, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the protracted
papal conclave, 1314–1316, the first of the
Avignon Papacy, was mediated by three incumbent and future
French monarchs in succession? | |||||||||
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal conclave, 1314–1316/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
MoS): 
- The lead is not all-inclusive; the lead is supposed to summarize the article, not introduce it (the lead should be sufficient to understand the topic and its outcome without reading the rest). The outcome is not mentioned in the summary. Otherwise the article is well written, with good prose and in line with the Manual of Style.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- The list of electors is not sourced, neither is the last paragraph of the "aftermath" section.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- User "upright" syntax with portrait (tall) images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
Categories:
- C-Class European Microstates articles
- Unknown-importance European Microstates articles
- C-Class Vatican City articles
- High-importance Vatican City articles
- Vatican City articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1314–1316 papal conclave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1314–1316 papal conclave was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
| A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 15, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the protracted
papal conclave, 1314–1316, the first of the
Avignon Papacy, was mediated by three incumbent and future
French monarchs in succession? | |||||||||
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal conclave, 1314–1316/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (
MoS):
- The lead is not all-inclusive; the lead is supposed to summarize the article, not introduce it (the lead should be sufficient to understand the topic and its outcome without reading the rest). The outcome is not mentioned in the summary. Otherwise the article is well written, with good prose and in line with the Manual of Style.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR):
- The list of electors is not sourced, neither is the last paragraph of the "aftermath" section.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- User "upright" syntax with portrait (tall) images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
Categories:
- C-Class European Microstates articles
- Unknown-importance European Microstates articles
- C-Class Vatican City articles
- High-importance Vatican City articles
- Vatican City articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia Did you know articles