11th millennium BC (
final version) received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 9 February 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
11th millennium BC article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
11th millennium BC was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
I've made a few changes to the draft, with notes in the edit summaries when applicable. I think the most important omission right now is the end of the
Late Glacial Interstadial and the beginning of the
Younger Dryas. Most of the information currently in the article is good, though I'm not sure how relevant it is that certain types of animals were at Aetokremnos. I imagine there were molluscs, sea birds, and reptiles in lots of places, so this doesn't seem terribly important unless I'm missing something. But really all the article needs is more information about the different aspects of the millennium as they're described in academic sources.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 16:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Alright. Thanks for helping me with the article! I made some changes to it and will try to find another source that talks about certain types of animals that were at Atekremnos. Right now the article is at C-class, which is understandable. Thanks for taking your time to help this draft!
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 21:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Current status #2
I have made a bunch of changes to the draft and it now has 20 notes! It has the exact same amount of notes as the 8th millennium BC. In my opinion, I think this draft will become a page in no time! Sadly, there is still a long ways away for this draft to reach good article standard due to there not being as much information as the 10th and 9th millennium BC's. Hopefully, this draft will pass both of them and also reach good article standards, and maybe Featured Articles.
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 01:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Okay, doesn't look like it.
This article says it dates to 13,400–18,600 BP (11,450–16,650 BC). Maybe something for a
12th millennium BC article.
Koopinator (
talk) 09:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)reply
I agree that we should not mention Jebal Sahaba in this article. I will try to mention it when I start working on the 12th millennium BC page.
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 15:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)reply
11th millennium BC (
final version) received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 9 February 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
11th millennium BC article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
11th millennium BC was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
I've made a few changes to the draft, with notes in the edit summaries when applicable. I think the most important omission right now is the end of the
Late Glacial Interstadial and the beginning of the
Younger Dryas. Most of the information currently in the article is good, though I'm not sure how relevant it is that certain types of animals were at Aetokremnos. I imagine there were molluscs, sea birds, and reptiles in lots of places, so this doesn't seem terribly important unless I'm missing something. But really all the article needs is more information about the different aspects of the millennium as they're described in academic sources.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 16:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Alright. Thanks for helping me with the article! I made some changes to it and will try to find another source that talks about certain types of animals that were at Atekremnos. Right now the article is at C-class, which is understandable. Thanks for taking your time to help this draft!
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 21:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Current status #2
I have made a bunch of changes to the draft and it now has 20 notes! It has the exact same amount of notes as the 8th millennium BC. In my opinion, I think this draft will become a page in no time! Sadly, there is still a long ways away for this draft to reach good article standard due to there not being as much information as the 10th and 9th millennium BC's. Hopefully, this draft will pass both of them and also reach good article standards, and maybe Featured Articles.
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 01:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Okay, doesn't look like it.
This article says it dates to 13,400–18,600 BP (11,450–16,650 BC). Maybe something for a
12th millennium BC article.
Koopinator (
talk) 09:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)reply
I agree that we should not mention Jebal Sahaba in this article. I will try to mention it when I start working on the 12th millennium BC page.
FerdinandLovesLegos (
talk) 15:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)reply
