10-pounder Parrott rifle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 19, 2023. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force United States: Civil War / Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:10-pounder Parrott rifle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 08:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I'll get to this shortly-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 08:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

• Images properly licensed

  Not sure Is everything in order?

  I'd have said something if something needed to be done.

• Link muzzle-loading rifled cannon, smoothbore, gunpowder, windage, ordnance, breech, trunnion, muzzle, lands and grooves, Ordnance Dept., rimbase, state of Virginia, carriage, trail, cheek pieces, sabot, caisson, limber, forge, howitzer

   Partly done Add links: muzzleloader, rifled cannon, smoothbore, gunpowder, windage, ordnance/artillery, chamber/breech, trunnion, muzzle, lands and grooves/rifling, Ordnance Dept., (no rimbase link), Virginia, gun carriage, (replaced trail & cheek pieces with gun carriage), sabot, limbers and caissons, forge. (Cannot find howitzer.)

  Howitzer, I suggest combining the separate links for muzzle-loading and rifled cannon into Muzzle-loading rifle

   Done muzzle-loading rifle is now in the first sentence of the introduction.

  Not sure I believe the only places I used the word howitzer were M1841 12-pounder howitzer and M1841 24-pounder howitzer. If the term is used somewhere else, please specify the section and I will add the link. Thanks.

  See this glossary of Civil War artillery terms definitions of rimbase and other terms like pendulum hausse. If possible, explain how the improved sights worked and why the original sights were changed.

  Thanks. I bookmarked that link.  Done I rechecked the source and added more details. The source said the new sight was improved, but didn't fully explain why.

• hyphenate cast iron, wrought iron

   Not done The names of the Wikipedia articles for these 2 terms are not hyphenated, so it isn't clear why this is necessary.

  In this form, they're a compound adjective modifying cannon, just like muzzle-loading. There are redirects for the hyphenated form

   Done For the noun, it's cast iron; for the adjective, it's cast-iron, etc.

• Projectile weights and range should be saved for the main body, IMO

   Done Removed from introduction paragraph.

• inflicting injury passive voice

   Done Rewrote phrase.

• Flexible isn't the appropriate term when discussing metallurgy. Use brittle and ductile with links

   Done Link brittle and ductility.

• What's a pendulum hausse rear sight?

  Not sure I cannot find an explanation anywhere. I just used "rear sight".

   Done Added "pendulum hausse" back in, but without explaining what it is, since the source didn't explain. In any case, it was replaced by an apparently superior system that I described.

• The caliber was the same as that of a smoothbore 3-pounder gun, which fired a round shot with a diameter of 2.9 inches Why is this relevant or important?

   Done Sentence re-phrased so it hopefully made more sense.

• Can you elaborate on the different ammunition makers and why Schenkl was barred from use?

   Done Rewrote this. Actually, both Schenkl and Hotchkiss shells were unsuitable for use with Parrott rifles. Added reason why Hotchkiss was not used, but source did not explain why Schenkl was also bad.

  Better, but what does "too great an impact" actually mean? Did it tend to separate the shell from the sabot or something?

   Done Added: Number of rifling grooves was different for 10-pounder Parrott and 3-inch Ordnance rifle. Hotchkiss sabot was torn off when fired from a 10-pounder Parrott.

• Move this to the beginning of the Specifications section: The 10-pounder Parrott rifle was a muzzle-loader.

   Done

• 57 10-pounder spell out the quantity or reword the sentence so that the quantity and name aren't adjacent

   Done Rewrote sentence.

• A couple of duplicate links

  Not sure Please be specific.

  this script will indentify them for you

   Done I added this to my common.js page. One duplicate link was found and removed.

• What makes civilwarhome reliable?-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 17:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

   Done Removed or replaced all civilwarhome citations and moved it to Further reading.

Edit1

The civilwarhome ref was moved to Further reading and other sources were used. Add more detail about ammunition types. Questioned why hyphenation was requested. Why 2.9-inch caliber was used. More fixes are coming. Djmaschek ( talk) 21:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Edit2

Add remaining suggested fixes, with a few exceptions. See above. Djmaschek ( talk) 00:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Sturmvogel 66: I think I'm done. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. Djmaschek ( talk) 00:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Still a few things to clarify.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 11:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Edit3

@ Sturmvogel 66: Added more corrections and details. See notes above. Djmaschek ( talk) 21:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply