This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
".hack//G.U. is a multimedia franchise created as a sequel to the .hack franchise."
Personally, I prefer Branch, with Subfranchise in a close second. To me, calling it a Franchise seems incorrect in some way. Everytime I think of it, I think of it as part of the .hack franchise. It even continues the computer/internet naming motif, "G.U. in / of .hack". You wouldn't know that .hack//Roots and .hack//CELL were part of .hack//G.U. just by looking at their names, but you can reasonably guess they are part of the overall franchise.
What term do you all think .hack//G.U. should be classified as? Mark4011 03:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
(UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
".hack//G.U. is a multimedia franchise created as a sequel to the .hack franchise."
Personally, I prefer Branch, with Subfranchise in a close second. To me, calling it a Franchise seems incorrect in some way. Everytime I think of it, I think of it as part of the .hack franchise. It even continues the computer/internet naming motif, "G.U. in / of .hack". You wouldn't know that .hack//Roots and .hack//CELL were part of .hack//G.U. just by looking at their names, but you can reasonably guess they are part of the overall franchise.
What term do you all think .hack//G.U. should be classified as? Mark4011 03:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
(UTC)