This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
.25 Stevens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article currently says: "suffered excessively high trajectory". That's the first time I've heard anyone regard drop as beneficial. Usually the cartridges with flat trajectories are being praised over those with a large drop. Seems very strange to me. -- BjKa ( talk) 21:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Elmer Keith calls the .25 Stevens "that most excellent cartridge". What gives? -- BjKa ( talk) 21:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
.25 Stevens article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article currently says: "suffered excessively high trajectory". That's the first time I've heard anyone regard drop as beneficial. Usually the cartridges with flat trajectories are being praised over those with a large drop. Seems very strange to me. -- BjKa ( talk) 21:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Elmer Keith calls the .25 Stevens "that most excellent cartridge". What gives? -- BjKa ( talk) 21:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)