![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I just noticed that m-derived filters is a redirect to image impedance, and so the short sentence in italics that comes first is not very useful, in case anyone cares. Huw Powell ( talk) 21:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
"Note that the circuit will work just as well if the capacitor and resistor are interchanged."
Uhhh.... This is normal for series components. Why does the article say this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.66.237 ( talk) 20:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
In the figure labeled "Zobel network correcting loudspeaker impedance", the formula should read C' = R^2/L. Xref the "Derivation" section, under "input impedance" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.44 ( talk) 15:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a great article, but the article states that it is rarely used nowadays. May be rare in telecommunications nowadays, but I have seen it many times in modern schematics. Andries ( talk) 15:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
We have this new comprehensive draft and I am wondering how much it duplicates existing material. Should we add this new article into the mix or should we try to use this new content to improve existing articles like this one, Bridged T delay equaliser, Electronic filter topology and Lattice network. ~ Kvng ( talk) 18:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Are these networks all due to Zobel? Some look rather similar to other inventors' efforts. They are all equalisers for sure, but Zobel,s?-- 213.205.242.154 ( talk) 02:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Why does this article use iwC instead of jwC. Electrical engineering has “always” used j as the symbol for the square-root of -1. Even Alexander and Sadiku, “Fundamentals of Electric Circuits”, sixth edition uses j. Really, it is just a question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rman2000 ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
{{citation needed}}
. Zobel certainly didn't in his papers and neither did any of his contemporaries as far as I recall. Use of is probably much more recent. In fact, I would go as far as to say that is only used in books aimed at a student audience.
Spinning
Spark
13:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I just noticed that m-derived filters is a redirect to image impedance, and so the short sentence in italics that comes first is not very useful, in case anyone cares. Huw Powell ( talk) 21:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
"Note that the circuit will work just as well if the capacitor and resistor are interchanged."
Uhhh.... This is normal for series components. Why does the article say this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.66.237 ( talk) 20:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
In the figure labeled "Zobel network correcting loudspeaker impedance", the formula should read C' = R^2/L. Xref the "Derivation" section, under "input impedance" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.44 ( talk) 15:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
This is a great article, but the article states that it is rarely used nowadays. May be rare in telecommunications nowadays, but I have seen it many times in modern schematics. Andries ( talk) 15:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
We have this new comprehensive draft and I am wondering how much it duplicates existing material. Should we add this new article into the mix or should we try to use this new content to improve existing articles like this one, Bridged T delay equaliser, Electronic filter topology and Lattice network. ~ Kvng ( talk) 18:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Are these networks all due to Zobel? Some look rather similar to other inventors' efforts. They are all equalisers for sure, but Zobel,s?-- 213.205.242.154 ( talk) 02:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Why does this article use iwC instead of jwC. Electrical engineering has “always” used j as the symbol for the square-root of -1. Even Alexander and Sadiku, “Fundamentals of Electric Circuits”, sixth edition uses j. Really, it is just a question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rman2000 ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
{{citation needed}}
. Zobel certainly didn't in his papers and neither did any of his contemporaries as far as I recall. Use of is probably much more recent. In fact, I would go as far as to say that is only used in books aimed at a student audience.
Spinning
Spark
13:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)