This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zhunan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Although the disputed Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) say that we should use ROC, it said nothing about using Taiwan, ROC. I think it should either be Taiwan only or ROC only, because people that aren't interested in reading the naming conventions for Chinese would be confused. And since there are naming conventions for common names ( WP:NC (common names)) as well, it would be much more appropriate to put Taiwan only. I wouldn't really care if you add extra information too.-- Jerrypp772000 01:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
It clearly states that you should say Republic of China. There is no need for more clarification. Taiwan is already there. The Republic of China is a sovereign state and Taiwan is not. You changed articles removing ROC or Republic of China without discussing and you are accusing others of not discussing? How dare you. Also, user vic and Jiang have both supported Republic of China over this, as this is a political entity article (city). - Nationalist 22:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Why aren't you saying anything about the conventions? They are there for a reason. Just follow it please. - Nationalist 01:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes. Taiwan, ROC is not the same as ROC (Taiwan) The second one is not correct. Taiwan is an administrative division under the Republic of China. Yes, please follow the conventions. Also, why dont you talk about the opinions of Jiang and Changlc and Vic in these township cases. Even Vic will agree to follow the conventions, because this is a political division. They have all reverted your edits more than once before. - Nationalist 03:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I believe Jiang, Vic, and Changlc are very fair and neutral. Especially vic because he had previously sided with you, but now understands the naming conventions. - Nationalist 03:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zhunan, Miaoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zhunan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although the disputed Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) say that we should use ROC, it said nothing about using Taiwan, ROC. I think it should either be Taiwan only or ROC only, because people that aren't interested in reading the naming conventions for Chinese would be confused. And since there are naming conventions for common names ( WP:NC (common names)) as well, it would be much more appropriate to put Taiwan only. I wouldn't really care if you add extra information too.-- Jerrypp772000 01:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
It clearly states that you should say Republic of China. There is no need for more clarification. Taiwan is already there. The Republic of China is a sovereign state and Taiwan is not. You changed articles removing ROC or Republic of China without discussing and you are accusing others of not discussing? How dare you. Also, user vic and Jiang have both supported Republic of China over this, as this is a political entity article (city). - Nationalist 22:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Why aren't you saying anything about the conventions? They are there for a reason. Just follow it please. - Nationalist 01:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes. Taiwan, ROC is not the same as ROC (Taiwan) The second one is not correct. Taiwan is an administrative division under the Republic of China. Yes, please follow the conventions. Also, why dont you talk about the opinions of Jiang and Changlc and Vic in these township cases. Even Vic will agree to follow the conventions, because this is a political division. They have all reverted your edits more than once before. - Nationalist 03:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I believe Jiang, Vic, and Changlc are very fair and neutral. Especially vic because he had previously sided with you, but now understands the naming conventions. - Nationalist 03:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zhunan, Miaoli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)