This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re moving BWV number to title: IF {{ infobox musical composition}} is used, there is a parameter catalogue number, which could be "BWV 105". We should not pretend that it is part of the title. If you ask me, consistency is less important within this article but with the other Bach cantata articles, inclusing those of higher quality, which intentionally mention the BWV number higher up, to help readers not knowing German to recognize that they at the right article. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
|catalogue=
to display the BWV number, it appears lower down than in the present version, which would seem inconsistent with the argument in your final sentence. Additionally, the present version matches the visual presentation of the article title and lead sentence. Consistency within an article is privileged over consistency between articles by several of our style guides, eg. DATEVAR, CITEVAR, ARTCON.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 11:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I thought about it, and think it's too misleading. Even one BWV number doesn't belong in the name-parameter, and two are downright confusing. This is for all articles, but I start here. The BWV number(s) belong only in the catalogue-parameter. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
|BWV=
in the latter, to solve the granularity problem. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 06:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re moving BWV number to title: IF {{ infobox musical composition}} is used, there is a parameter catalogue number, which could be "BWV 105". We should not pretend that it is part of the title. If you ask me, consistency is less important within this article but with the other Bach cantata articles, inclusing those of higher quality, which intentionally mention the BWV number higher up, to help readers not knowing German to recognize that they at the right article. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
|catalogue=
to display the BWV number, it appears lower down than in the present version, which would seem inconsistent with the argument in your final sentence. Additionally, the present version matches the visual presentation of the article title and lead sentence. Consistency within an article is privileged over consistency between articles by several of our style guides, eg. DATEVAR, CITEVAR, ARTCON.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 11:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I thought about it, and think it's too misleading. Even one BWV number doesn't belong in the name-parameter, and two are downright confusing. This is for all articles, but I start here. The BWV number(s) belong only in the catalogue-parameter. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
|BWV=
in the latter, to solve the granularity problem. --
Gerda Arendt (
talk) 06:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)