This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security. Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: history watch purge Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Answer question about Same-origin_policy Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

http://www.zonealarm.com/blog/2014/06/zeroaccess-botnet-is-it-preparing-its-next-attack/ - Jmabel | Talk 05:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I'd like to resolve an editing issue since many ip users are placing content without references. According to different security companies ZeroAccess is not a network hacking, but is a Trojan. At first I thought that it was a mistaken good faith edit and reverted it, despite this it keeps getting placed back in. I'm not certain if this is intentional vandalism or if it's good faith editing. I'd like that there may be some references added or that the article be semi-protected to prevent edit warring. FockeWulf FW 190 ( talk) 19:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC) reply