| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zero-ohm link article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Shouldn't it be "zero" instead of "infinite" in the following part of the article?
- ... a fractional tolerance (as a percentage of the zero-ohm ideal value) would be infinite ...
-- Mortense ( talk) 06:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have changed it to "zero". Please step forward if you disagree. -- Mortense ( talk) 10:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Say the value is between and . The tolerance is then . In the case of a zero ohm resistor the tolerance is thus . Bomazi ( talk) 22:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
-- Kuldeep Singh Dhaka (kuldeepdhaka9@gmail.com) Sat 11 2014 08:25 (IST)
- a nice conversation on this topic (especially at the last message) http://www.edaboard.com/thread24453.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.223.76 ( talk) 14:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The "Design considerations" sections reads like a howto and is missing sources. I'm suspecting this is original research and the need to route high current (around/above 10 A or so) through a zero ohm link is probably quite rare and at least not typical for most electronics. I suspect that at this point the quality of the soldering and surface/size of pads and so on has a much higher impact than the supposed resistance of a zero ohm link. In any case, these dubious claims should be well sourced or I'd vote to remove them. -- Jonathan Haas ( talk) 07:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zero-ohm link article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Shouldn't it be "zero" instead of "infinite" in the following part of the article?
- ... a fractional tolerance (as a percentage of the zero-ohm ideal value) would be infinite ...
-- Mortense ( talk) 06:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have changed it to "zero". Please step forward if you disagree. -- Mortense ( talk) 10:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Say the value is between and . The tolerance is then . In the case of a zero ohm resistor the tolerance is thus . Bomazi ( talk) 22:21, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
-- Kuldeep Singh Dhaka (kuldeepdhaka9@gmail.com) Sat 11 2014 08:25 (IST)
- a nice conversation on this topic (especially at the last message) http://www.edaboard.com/thread24453.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.223.76 ( talk) 14:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The "Design considerations" sections reads like a howto and is missing sources. I'm suspecting this is original research and the need to route high current (around/above 10 A or so) through a zero ohm link is probably quite rare and at least not typical for most electronics. I suspect that at this point the quality of the soldering and surface/size of pads and so on has a much higher impact than the supposed resistance of a zero ohm link. In any case, these dubious claims should be well sourced or I'd vote to remove them. -- Jonathan Haas ( talk) 07:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)