![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zensar Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 06:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
I have looked at the current state of this article and believe while the article has cleanup issues there is nothing overly significant relating to Unpaid editting, perhaps a couple of claims to identify, but nothing that can't be better handled by Refimprove and cn templating say. I am therefore going to replace the UDP template with a Refimprove, leaving this record in the talk. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 05:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Cruncbase says 1991. The Economic Times (ref tag ET-Zensar-20181013) says 1963. Why? How to resolve? Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Now the company history, and what has just re-entered this article, can be read as Zensar is trying to claim history for the totality of these companies history. My suspicion (which it based upon what seems reasonable) is 'Zensar' operation was an operation that manufacturers and possibly sales/supported for the above companies under an avatar of their name, most likely building products to licence particularly in the early days). In some ways I suspect the operation may have had elements of a franchise. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Some pointers:
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Since 9 February 2019 I have reverted Deepakhmwiki twice ... generally for removing previous content. I am under the impression Deepakhmwiki wishes to remove history and display other current information more prominently. In general the cited (ideally independent) updating of turnover figures to more recent ones is to be welcomed; the removal of history is not. The article has been subject to much promotional editing in the past, was subject to intense scrutiny at the 3 October 2018 deletion review, and has been subject to disruptive editing since. Effort has been made to avoid a neutrality. Please discuss here if necessary.
It has come to my attention possibly through Deepakhmwiki's edit the (2016) archived cite for the unlabeled is not responding correctly and the original reference is unavailable. The figure of $480m USD seems correct. The 10 February attempt to by Deepakhmwiki has altered the figure to USD 6.7M which seems incorrect. The Revenue figure in the infobox does however need to be updated with a suitable citation. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 06:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi...I just got told that as I work for Zensar, I should not make edits on the Zensar page. I understand that now, and will refrain from doing so in the future. Meanwhile, will the change that I made (updating the revenues based on a published reference) go through...or should I request a third party to do the same. Thank you for your support (and warm welcome to the Wiki community). Abhishek.vanamali ( talk) 06:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zensar Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 06:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
I have looked at the current state of this article and believe while the article has cleanup issues there is nothing overly significant relating to Unpaid editting, perhaps a couple of claims to identify, but nothing that can't be better handled by Refimprove and cn templating say. I am therefore going to replace the UDP template with a Refimprove, leaving this record in the talk. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 05:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Cruncbase says 1991. The Economic Times (ref tag ET-Zensar-20181013) says 1963. Why? How to resolve? Djm-leighpark ( talk) 21:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Now the company history, and what has just re-entered this article, can be read as Zensar is trying to claim history for the totality of these companies history. My suspicion (which it based upon what seems reasonable) is 'Zensar' operation was an operation that manufacturers and possibly sales/supported for the above companies under an avatar of their name, most likely building products to licence particularly in the early days). In some ways I suspect the operation may have had elements of a franchise. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Some pointers:
Djm-leighpark ( talk) 15:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Since 9 February 2019 I have reverted Deepakhmwiki twice ... generally for removing previous content. I am under the impression Deepakhmwiki wishes to remove history and display other current information more prominently. In general the cited (ideally independent) updating of turnover figures to more recent ones is to be welcomed; the removal of history is not. The article has been subject to much promotional editing in the past, was subject to intense scrutiny at the 3 October 2018 deletion review, and has been subject to disruptive editing since. Effort has been made to avoid a neutrality. Please discuss here if necessary.
It has come to my attention possibly through Deepakhmwiki's edit the (2016) archived cite for the unlabeled is not responding correctly and the original reference is unavailable. The figure of $480m USD seems correct. The 10 February attempt to by Deepakhmwiki has altered the figure to USD 6.7M which seems incorrect. The Revenue figure in the infobox does however need to be updated with a suitable citation. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 06:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi...I just got told that as I work for Zensar, I should not make edits on the Zensar page. I understand that now, and will refrain from doing so in the future. Meanwhile, will the change that I made (updating the revenues based on a published reference) go through...or should I request a third party to do the same. Thank you for your support (and warm welcome to the Wiki community). Abhishek.vanamali ( talk) 06:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)