![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone who is technical: Please add a less technical (more toward simpler English explanation) for each line. People newer to these things can learn a lot from this, but only if they know what it means. I personally was unable to find it translated to non-technical English 134.186.234.108 ( talk) 21:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I thought that perhaps if someone searches for import this, that it should redirect to this. Not sure how that's done. MinorFixes ( talk) 03:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
-- Ok, I fig'ed it out. import this redirects to here. MinorFixes ( talk) 03:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
1) I think the principles would be much easier to read, if they would have bullet points or numbering.
I added numbering, but it was reverted. Changing back and forth makes no sense, so I'd like to have a little dialogue. Reason for not using numbering was "They are not listed with numbers". If the list of principles is a quote, the article should say so. If it's not a quote the reasoning for not using numbers should be changed.
2) Change the image size might make the article more readable.
This is how the article looks on my screen:
______________________________________________ Beautiful | | is | | better | | then | | ugly. | | Explicit | | is | Image | better | | than | | implicit. | | Simple | | is | | better | | than | | complex. | |
I changed it, but the change was reverted. For the same reason as above, I'd like to have a little dialogue on that.
I'd like to note, that not everyone has a big screen or high DPI. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BookRings (
talk •
contribs)
11:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
<poem>
CSS doesn't already include such functionality. Moving the image up also works and was something I considered since it still interfered with the list on smaller viewports.
Opencooper (
talk)
05:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone who is technical: Please add a less technical (more toward simpler English explanation) for each line. People newer to these things can learn a lot from this, but only if they know what it means. I personally was unable to find it translated to non-technical English 134.186.234.108 ( talk) 21:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I thought that perhaps if someone searches for import this, that it should redirect to this. Not sure how that's done. MinorFixes ( talk) 03:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
-- Ok, I fig'ed it out. import this redirects to here. MinorFixes ( talk) 03:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
1) I think the principles would be much easier to read, if they would have bullet points or numbering.
I added numbering, but it was reverted. Changing back and forth makes no sense, so I'd like to have a little dialogue. Reason for not using numbering was "They are not listed with numbers". If the list of principles is a quote, the article should say so. If it's not a quote the reasoning for not using numbers should be changed.
2) Change the image size might make the article more readable.
This is how the article looks on my screen:
______________________________________________ Beautiful | | is | | better | | then | | ugly. | | Explicit | | is | Image | better | | than | | implicit. | | Simple | | is | | better | | than | | complex. | |
I changed it, but the change was reverted. For the same reason as above, I'd like to have a little dialogue on that.
I'd like to note, that not everyone has a big screen or high DPI. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BookRings (
talk •
contribs)
11:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
<poem>
CSS doesn't already include such functionality. Moving the image up also works and was something I considered since it still interfered with the list on smaller viewports.
Opencooper (
talk)
05:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)