Zarqa River has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
December 31, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Zarqa River, which is Jordan's third largest, is so polluted that it is considered an "environmental blackspot"? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Need etymology. Badagnani ( talk) 10:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Jabbok (primarily) discusses the biblical references to Jabbok, so I think it is inappropriate to merge this article into it. Perhaps we can do the reverse - merge the material from Jabbok here, into a 'Biblical references' section. NoCal100 ( talk) 15:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The article is being reviewed here. Livna-Maor ( talk) 21:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Review transcluded below (and still open). Geometry guy 22:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
The article could use quite a few more images for GA. Shannon1 talk contribs 17:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Zarqa River. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Zarqa River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I was trying to translate this article to another Wikipedia project seeing this as a Good Article, but after reading for a while I felt like this might not fit GA standard. It wasn't until now that I realized the original GA review discussion was only participated by users who have abused sockpuppets and have been blocked indefinitely. Only these users participated in the review:
These accounts also majorly edited the article in its early phase (2008-2009). Now I would like a reassessment by community to see if this article meets GA standard. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 19:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Is it the "river of the blue city" (intro) or the "blue river" (name section)? Lesgles ( talk) 17:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Zarqa River has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
December 31, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Zarqa River, which is Jordan's third largest, is so polluted that it is considered an "environmental blackspot"? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Need etymology. Badagnani ( talk) 10:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Jabbok (primarily) discusses the biblical references to Jabbok, so I think it is inappropriate to merge this article into it. Perhaps we can do the reverse - merge the material from Jabbok here, into a 'Biblical references' section. NoCal100 ( talk) 15:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The article is being reviewed here. Livna-Maor ( talk) 21:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Review transcluded below (and still open). Geometry guy 22:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
The article could use quite a few more images for GA. Shannon1 talk contribs 17:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Zarqa River. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Zarqa River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I was trying to translate this article to another Wikipedia project seeing this as a Good Article, but after reading for a while I felt like this might not fit GA standard. It wasn't until now that I realized the original GA review discussion was only participated by users who have abused sockpuppets and have been blocked indefinitely. Only these users participated in the review:
These accounts also majorly edited the article in its early phase (2008-2009). Now I would like a reassessment by community to see if this article meets GA standard. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 19:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Is it the "river of the blue city" (intro) or the "blue river" (name section)? Lesgles ( talk) 17:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)