Zapata rail is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 11, 2016. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 16, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that there may be as few as 250 of the
Zapata Rail (pictured) in its only habitat, the
Zapata Swamp? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
Reviewer: Sasata ( talk) 00:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Review claimed, comments soon. Sasata ( talk) 00:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The article meets all of the GA criteria: Sasata ( talk) 04:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The current binomial name of this rail is sourced only to the original description, leaving its name unreferenced in this article. The original description may be useful for some aspects of the article, as its usage after the authoerity in the taxobox, for example. However, an organism's name ia not today defined by the original authority, but by the body of taxonomic literature about the organism. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a body of taxonomic experts, a review article or bird book, sufficiently recent, with the authority would be appropriate. Eau ( talk) 02:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm not so sure the image that was just added is PD. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#United_States The problem is that we don't know what work it was published in in 1928 and if it was renewed. This definitely isn't PD because of life+70 years.
very faithfully artical Maroof Ali ( talk) 23:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zapata rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Zapata rail is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 11, 2016. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 16, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that there may be as few as 250 of the
Zapata Rail (pictured) in its only habitat, the
Zapata Swamp? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: Sasata ( talk) 00:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Review claimed, comments soon. Sasata ( talk) 00:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The article meets all of the GA criteria: Sasata ( talk) 04:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The current binomial name of this rail is sourced only to the original description, leaving its name unreferenced in this article. The original description may be useful for some aspects of the article, as its usage after the authoerity in the taxobox, for example. However, an organism's name ia not today defined by the original authority, but by the body of taxonomic literature about the organism. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a body of taxonomic experts, a review article or bird book, sufficiently recent, with the authority would be appropriate. Eau ( talk) 02:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm not so sure the image that was just added is PD. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#United_States The problem is that we don't know what work it was published in in 1928 and if it was renewed. This definitely isn't PD because of life+70 years.
very faithfully artical Maroof Ali ( talk) 23:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zapata rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)