This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2021. The result of the discussion was Procedural keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A big part of the "massacre" section of this article contains multiple issues for instance the following statement:
uses TigrayOnline as a source. Which is a politically motivated website that posts impartial and biased articles.
The article goes on to say
There is no reliable source presented for the shelling of a church in Zalambessa. Tghat is a new blog website that releases subjective views on issues of Tigray and has a conflict of interest. Wikipedia asks to exercise caution when using such sources. Check WP:SELFPUB .
Another claim in the article
This claim has EEPA web blog as a reference. EEPA blog is presented here as an authoritative source. Please check WP:SELFPUB and present verifiable sources to back the claim.
The tone of the above paragraph shows impartiality to the circumstances in Tigray WP:IMPARTIAL and is composed of allegations which can't be verified by any independent entities to the matter. It lacks sources WP:SOURCE. The cited audio does not substantiate the claim.
In the intro, it says
The introduction section consists of references to a single research named Tigray: Atlas of the humanitarian situation. This paper is a non peer reviewed original research which is made by entities that are close to the event. WP:OR makes it quite clear that Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.
It goes also against wikipedia policy of WP:PRIMARY . Please use reliable sources that back the claim that has been made in the article. Check out WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY for more information.
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 November 2021. The result of the discussion was Procedural keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A big part of the "massacre" section of this article contains multiple issues for instance the following statement:
uses TigrayOnline as a source. Which is a politically motivated website that posts impartial and biased articles.
The article goes on to say
There is no reliable source presented for the shelling of a church in Zalambessa. Tghat is a new blog website that releases subjective views on issues of Tigray and has a conflict of interest. Wikipedia asks to exercise caution when using such sources. Check WP:SELFPUB .
Another claim in the article
This claim has EEPA web blog as a reference. EEPA blog is presented here as an authoritative source. Please check WP:SELFPUB and present verifiable sources to back the claim.
The tone of the above paragraph shows impartiality to the circumstances in Tigray WP:IMPARTIAL and is composed of allegations which can't be verified by any independent entities to the matter. It lacks sources WP:SOURCE. The cited audio does not substantiate the claim.
In the intro, it says
The introduction section consists of references to a single research named Tigray: Atlas of the humanitarian situation. This paper is a non peer reviewed original research which is made by entities that are close to the event. WP:OR makes it quite clear that Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. The phrase "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.
It goes also against wikipedia policy of WP:PRIMARY . Please use reliable sources that back the claim that has been made in the article. Check out WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY for more information.