![]() | Zail Singh has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: Error: Invalid time.. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zail Singh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Zail Singh appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Boasting about being first Sikh to hold the highest honor is actually defaming him and his religion. He was holding the highest post and honor in country because of his qualities and/or qualifications, not because he was a Sikh. Information moved to second paragraph. Vivek Talk!! 02:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Did the President make any attempt to open his presidential mansion to protect the innocent Sikhs who were being targeted in the 1984 riots in Delhi? He could have used his authority and status to protect them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.245.242 ( talk) 10:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this indian president-related article a stub? shouldnt this article be give stub-status? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.12.114 ( talk) 16:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
"Many people believe that he was chosen by Indira Gandhi only because she wanted to have her hold on the office of President as she was having her hold on the party."
Needs revision and attribution. 24.125.38.175 ( talk) 04:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC) R.E.D.
I see his second name is Zail. Is he half Muslim? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.224.225 ( talk) 19:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zail Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The article says that he was imprisoned in 1947 and tortured "for 5 years" but also that he was offered the post of minister in 1949. How can both be true? KropotkinSchmopotkin ( talk) 14:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
LordPeterII (
talk)
21:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Ashwin147 ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ:
Overall:
@
Ashwin147: Just waiting on your QPQ and you'll be good to go! Fantastic work expanding this article from what it was beforehand, you really put a lot of hard work into it. The hook is interesting and President Singh's life even more so.
— That Coptic Guy (
talk)
18:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
To Prep 6
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sarangem ( talk · contribs) 12:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Properly follows layout. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Try to cite references in a template, not manually.
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | It would be better if 10th citation is not formatted in PDF.
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No plagiarism as of Earwig's detector |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | In section Union Minister of Home Affairs (1980–82), Bhindranwale's release is properly mentioned (that should be summarised properly in lead section's 4th paragraph.)
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Congrats on being GA. Make sure it follows the GA Criterias afterwards. |
![]() | Zail Singh has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: Error: Invalid time.. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zail Singh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from Zail Singh appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 November 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Boasting about being first Sikh to hold the highest honor is actually defaming him and his religion. He was holding the highest post and honor in country because of his qualities and/or qualifications, not because he was a Sikh. Information moved to second paragraph. Vivek Talk!! 02:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Did the President make any attempt to open his presidential mansion to protect the innocent Sikhs who were being targeted in the 1984 riots in Delhi? He could have used his authority and status to protect them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.245.242 ( talk) 10:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this indian president-related article a stub? shouldnt this article be give stub-status? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.12.114 ( talk) 16:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
"Many people believe that he was chosen by Indira Gandhi only because she wanted to have her hold on the office of President as she was having her hold on the party."
Needs revision and attribution. 24.125.38.175 ( talk) 04:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC) R.E.D.
I see his second name is Zail. Is he half Muslim? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.224.225 ( talk) 19:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zail Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The article says that he was imprisoned in 1947 and tortured "for 5 years" but also that he was offered the post of minister in 1949. How can both be true? KropotkinSchmopotkin ( talk) 14:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
LordPeterII (
talk)
21:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
5x expanded by Ashwin147 ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ:
Overall:
@
Ashwin147: Just waiting on your QPQ and you'll be good to go! Fantastic work expanding this article from what it was beforehand, you really put a lot of hard work into it. The hook is interesting and President Singh's life even more so.
— That Coptic Guy (
talk)
18:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
To Prep 6
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sarangem ( talk · contribs) 12:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Properly follows layout. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Try to cite references in a template, not manually.
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | It would be better if 10th citation is not formatted in PDF.
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No plagiarism as of Earwig's detector |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | In section Union Minister of Home Affairs (1980–82), Bhindranwale's release is properly mentioned (that should be summarised properly in lead section's 4th paragraph.)
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Congrats on being GA. Make sure it follows the GA Criterias afterwards. |