This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
ZCBI redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
(Copied from User talk:Saurabhmadan, the original editor of the article)
Sir, its just a full information pass on through your site. No its not in any ways an attempt to advertise but only to give the reaader full information about the subject. As for the references they are actual newspaper cuttings and you can check that with the newspapers themselves. This site has previously also allowed in various cases a few references of newspapers. You are right that its a new institute and its own sites cannot be considered as references but for the time being i request you to please let it be like that and may be within a week i can arrange for some more concrete references. Thanks in advance sir, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabhmadan ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 4 June 2008
Blowdart is right on this one. The tone of this page is entirely inappropriate, so I'm going to revert back to the last good version. I'm still wavering on whether or not ZCBI is actually notable, and I'm having a really difficult time finding reliable secondary sources. Blowdart, would you want to mark this page for AfD, or do you think there's something worth saving here? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
What we can do is that we can cut short the article and just give the gist of everything if you want to. Hoping for a cooperative and positive response —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabhmadan ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
ZCBI redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
(Copied from User talk:Saurabhmadan, the original editor of the article)
Sir, its just a full information pass on through your site. No its not in any ways an attempt to advertise but only to give the reaader full information about the subject. As for the references they are actual newspaper cuttings and you can check that with the newspapers themselves. This site has previously also allowed in various cases a few references of newspapers. You are right that its a new institute and its own sites cannot be considered as references but for the time being i request you to please let it be like that and may be within a week i can arrange for some more concrete references. Thanks in advance sir, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabhmadan ( talk • contribs) 12:44, 4 June 2008
Blowdart is right on this one. The tone of this page is entirely inappropriate, so I'm going to revert back to the last good version. I'm still wavering on whether or not ZCBI is actually notable, and I'm having a really difficult time finding reliable secondary sources. Blowdart, would you want to mark this page for AfD, or do you think there's something worth saving here? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
What we can do is that we can cut short the article and just give the gist of everything if you want to. Hoping for a cooperative and positive response —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabhmadan ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)