This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Yuktibhāṣā article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Yuktibhāṣā appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The word "unique" is appropriate there. See Unique Bharatveer 10:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, but the phrase "considered as the first text on calculus" smacks of NPOV. All of the references for this statement either have a regional slant, such as the Caniscus College reference [1] or the reference for the Government of Kerala [2], or directly or indirectly reference the Whish work [3]. Some more information on more recent interpretations of the Whish work would be helpful to your cause. Ggugvunt 19:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Could someone document the rectangular argument at sine rule or provide them with the resources to do so? ᛭ LokiClock ( talk) 16:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The date given for this treatise (16th century CE) is not consistent with being "three centuries" before James Gregory. Rob Burbidge ( talk) 22:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
There are other forgeries. For instance, the Keralolpahti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:D182:24C1:6469:8001:AF6C:9208 ( talk) 09:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Yuktibhāṣā. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
There are major problems with the tone and neutrality of the article. For example:
It is considered, possibly the first text, on the foundations of calculus predating those of others outside India such as European mathematicians James Gregory and Newton by many centuries.[3][4][5][6][7]
and
However, due to globalization and the wider flow of information, the wider world began to learn the history of these sciences. For example, both Oxford University (a premier University in Britain)and Royal Society of Great Britain have accepted the Indian & Asian consensus, that Calculus and many such pioneering mathematical theorems originated in India, previously having incorrectly ascribed them to others.[4][5][6][7]
Both passages are in the lead. The sources are either junk or they don't support the (weasel-worded) claims being made. The same POV-pushing has also been happening at Calculus (see the recent edit history). Perhaps an an WP:NPOV or WP:FRINGE tag would be more appropriate, but whichever is being used, the same fundamental problems remain. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 18:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
<
RetroCraft
314 />
06:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Kerala school didnt discover tangent series. Their discoveries were sin,cos and arctan . So i have edited the paragraph that says they discovered tangent series Jino john1996 ( talk) 08:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
It is clear that the Yuktibhāṣā is the main text. Both its Sanskrit translation (Gaṇita-yukti-bhāṣā) and the modern volumes (2 volumes translating the Malayalam Yuktibhāṣā and 1 volume that is an edition of the Sanskrit text) can be more clearly discussed on the Yuktibhāṣā article. Shreevatsa ( talk) 19:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Malayalam Yuktibhāṣā ---> English edition (2008, Vols 1 and 2 of series, published by Springer) Sanskrit Ganita-yuktibhāṣā ---> Critical edition (2004, Vol 3 of the series, published by IIAS Shimla)
A ---> B C ---> D
The reference "Science and technology in free India" (PDF). Government of Kerala—Kerala Call, September 2004. Prof.C.G.Ramachandran Nair. Retrieved 2006-07-09. is broken and it's cited as a source for many of the articles so I have removed it. Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 16:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Yuktibhāṣā article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Yuktibhāṣā appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The word "unique" is appropriate there. See Unique Bharatveer 10:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I apologize, but the phrase "considered as the first text on calculus" smacks of NPOV. All of the references for this statement either have a regional slant, such as the Caniscus College reference [1] or the reference for the Government of Kerala [2], or directly or indirectly reference the Whish work [3]. Some more information on more recent interpretations of the Whish work would be helpful to your cause. Ggugvunt 19:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Could someone document the rectangular argument at sine rule or provide them with the resources to do so? ᛭ LokiClock ( talk) 16:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The date given for this treatise (16th century CE) is not consistent with being "three centuries" before James Gregory. Rob Burbidge ( talk) 22:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
There are other forgeries. For instance, the Keralolpahti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:D182:24C1:6469:8001:AF6C:9208 ( talk) 09:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Yuktibhāṣā. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
There are major problems with the tone and neutrality of the article. For example:
It is considered, possibly the first text, on the foundations of calculus predating those of others outside India such as European mathematicians James Gregory and Newton by many centuries.[3][4][5][6][7]
and
However, due to globalization and the wider flow of information, the wider world began to learn the history of these sciences. For example, both Oxford University (a premier University in Britain)and Royal Society of Great Britain have accepted the Indian & Asian consensus, that Calculus and many such pioneering mathematical theorems originated in India, previously having incorrectly ascribed them to others.[4][5][6][7]
Both passages are in the lead. The sources are either junk or they don't support the (weasel-worded) claims being made. The same POV-pushing has also been happening at Calculus (see the recent edit history). Perhaps an an WP:NPOV or WP:FRINGE tag would be more appropriate, but whichever is being used, the same fundamental problems remain. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 18:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
<
RetroCraft
314 />
06:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Kerala school didnt discover tangent series. Their discoveries were sin,cos and arctan . So i have edited the paragraph that says they discovered tangent series Jino john1996 ( talk) 08:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
It is clear that the Yuktibhāṣā is the main text. Both its Sanskrit translation (Gaṇita-yukti-bhāṣā) and the modern volumes (2 volumes translating the Malayalam Yuktibhāṣā and 1 volume that is an edition of the Sanskrit text) can be more clearly discussed on the Yuktibhāṣā article. Shreevatsa ( talk) 19:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Malayalam Yuktibhāṣā ---> English edition (2008, Vols 1 and 2 of series, published by Springer) Sanskrit Ganita-yuktibhāṣā ---> Critical edition (2004, Vol 3 of the series, published by IIAS Shimla)
A ---> B C ---> D
The reference "Science and technology in free India" (PDF). Government of Kerala—Kerala Call, September 2004. Prof.C.G.Ramachandran Nair. Retrieved 2006-07-09. is broken and it's cited as a source for many of the articles so I have removed it. Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 16:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)