Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GamerPro64 ( talk · contribs) 23:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Gonna stake my claim to review this. Will add comments to it soon. GamerPro64 23:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

I think so far the article is pretty good as is. One complaint I have off the bat is that both images used have incomplete FUR in them. I suggest filling them out. GamerPro64 02:19, 11 April 2019 (UTC) reply

@ GamerPro64: Completed the FUR for both images TarkusAB ^talk 15:14, 13 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Heres a minor issue. The GamesTM link is dead. GamerPro64 18:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC) reply

@ GamerPro64: And it wasn't archived...great. Thankfully it was a reprint of an article in issue 109 of gamesTM so I changed the source to the magazine. TarkusAB ^talk 23:33, 16 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Ok so I am pretty confident in promoting this article to Good Article status. And if anyone disagrees with this decision, you can take this up at GAR. GamerPro64 02:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC) reply