This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not exactly related to this article specifically, but could somebody do an article on Mighty Endowed from YJ #1? I would, but I haven't read the actual issue, so I'm not exactly qualified.
Image:LilLobo01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The section has been improved a little, but I still question whether it should be included in the article. It isn't about either the team (as they've disbanded) or the series, and it seems redundant with (and more appropriate for) the character's respective articles. And like with Justice League International, it's started to overtake the article. I'd really like to hear other people's opinions about why the section should or shouldn't be included. BlankHole 19:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought the origin of One Million Impulse was explicitly stated in the issue...the article is not so sure. Lots42 ( talk) 03:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted out twice the inference that Artemis is actually Tigress
This vagueness as to the in-comic identification of Artemis (also reinforced by an equal level of vagueness in the cited YouTube video) means that they are likely keeping it vague for a reason, and it isn't our place to try an Sherlock it out. As Wikipedia editors, we are not allowed to connect the dots; we cite those reliable sources who do that. When we have explicit citation connecting her to someone specific within the DCU, we can do so as well. Not before. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 03:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
First of all, don't be snippy; I'm not interested in trading barbs with you, as it serves no purpose other than to piss one or both of us off. Of course I watch the show; why else would I contribute to the article? I'm one episode behind you. That said, I must have missed the end credits wherein they identify her as Artemis Crock; if they've done this from the beginning, then mea culpa. In either case, because - from your earlier citations - her identity within the DCU was in question, you need an explicit source. I do not think that a screencap will cover it; you are correct that a link to Youtube won't do it. maybe seek out the needed reference from the official website?.
As well, the character of Aqualad is not not new, but the use of a new person in the role is. We need to note that; the way it was written, it proposed that the character of Aqualad is new. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 15:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
References
In the section about the recently late tie-in comic, there’s a claim that a camping trip was in homage to a similar campout in the original comics. I don’t doubt this, but is there a source to back it up? Because otherwise, it’s original research. The source cited in that section says nothing about paying homage and nothing about the original series. — Frungi ( talk) 06:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Young Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not exactly related to this article specifically, but could somebody do an article on Mighty Endowed from YJ #1? I would, but I haven't read the actual issue, so I'm not exactly qualified.
Image:LilLobo01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The section has been improved a little, but I still question whether it should be included in the article. It isn't about either the team (as they've disbanded) or the series, and it seems redundant with (and more appropriate for) the character's respective articles. And like with Justice League International, it's started to overtake the article. I'd really like to hear other people's opinions about why the section should or shouldn't be included. BlankHole 19:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought the origin of One Million Impulse was explicitly stated in the issue...the article is not so sure. Lots42 ( talk) 03:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted out twice the inference that Artemis is actually Tigress
This vagueness as to the in-comic identification of Artemis (also reinforced by an equal level of vagueness in the cited YouTube video) means that they are likely keeping it vague for a reason, and it isn't our place to try an Sherlock it out. As Wikipedia editors, we are not allowed to connect the dots; we cite those reliable sources who do that. When we have explicit citation connecting her to someone specific within the DCU, we can do so as well. Not before. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 03:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
First of all, don't be snippy; I'm not interested in trading barbs with you, as it serves no purpose other than to piss one or both of us off. Of course I watch the show; why else would I contribute to the article? I'm one episode behind you. That said, I must have missed the end credits wherein they identify her as Artemis Crock; if they've done this from the beginning, then mea culpa. In either case, because - from your earlier citations - her identity within the DCU was in question, you need an explicit source. I do not think that a screencap will cover it; you are correct that a link to Youtube won't do it. maybe seek out the needed reference from the official website?.
As well, the character of Aqualad is not not new, but the use of a new person in the role is. We need to note that; the way it was written, it proposed that the character of Aqualad is new. - Jack Sebastian ( talk) 15:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
References
In the section about the recently late tie-in comic, there’s a claim that a camping trip was in homage to a similar campout in the original comics. I don’t doubt this, but is there a source to back it up? Because otherwise, it’s original research. The source cited in that section says nothing about paying homage and nothing about the original series. — Frungi ( talk) 06:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Young Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)