This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've copied what follows from the Green Party of England and Wales discussion page, and have made some editorial changes in line with reducing the size of linked passages and not overlinking.
Gordon 16:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This page had become rather jumbled through the recent (and very informative) expansions. I have tried to bring it in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In particular:
Regards, Ground Zero | t 22:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
The definite article is not used at the start of this article but is used elsewhere. The YG constitution doesn't use it but elsewhere I think it is usually (but not always) used. Perhaps, a parenthesis would be appropriate; however, it should still be consistent in the article.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 10:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
My deletion of the hatnote as it is non-disambiguating (in violation of WP:HN#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous) was reverted. Is there any point to this hatnote? Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Take general discussion to Wikipedia talk:Hatnotes#Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous.
I think the names of the committee members are irrelevant to the reader as none of them are well-known. There seems to be a trend to add them to organisation articles. Maybe we should have a policy on this. Any opinions?
Also, I prefer definition lists to tables for this sort of thing. (However, table might look nicer and it would be hard to make a def. list look like a table.) WP is relatively HTML non-compliant, anyway, unfortunately. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Young Greens (Green Party of England and Wales) → Young Greens (England and Wales) … Rationale: Occam's Razor; current title is redundant as no other organisation in England and Wales has young greens in its name; for international purposes, the article's subject is known by the proposed title, never the existing one.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Young Greens of England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/staff/jenny_pickerill/publications has some info on this network. She interviewed self-identifying members in 1999 so it was in existence then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.23.158 ( talk) 13:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've copied what follows from the Green Party of England and Wales discussion page, and have made some editorial changes in line with reducing the size of linked passages and not overlinking.
Gordon 16:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This page had become rather jumbled through the recent (and very informative) expansions. I have tried to bring it in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In particular:
Regards, Ground Zero | t 22:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
The definite article is not used at the start of this article but is used elsewhere. The YG constitution doesn't use it but elsewhere I think it is usually (but not always) used. Perhaps, a parenthesis would be appropriate; however, it should still be consistent in the article.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 10:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
My deletion of the hatnote as it is non-disambiguating (in violation of WP:HN#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous) was reverted. Is there any point to this hatnote? Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
P.S. Take general discussion to Wikipedia talk:Hatnotes#Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous.
I think the names of the committee members are irrelevant to the reader as none of them are well-known. There seems to be a trend to add them to organisation articles. Maybe we should have a policy on this. Any opinions?
Also, I prefer definition lists to tables for this sort of thing. (However, table might look nicer and it would be hard to make a def. list look like a table.) WP is relatively HTML non-compliant, anyway, unfortunately. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Young Greens (Green Party of England and Wales) → Young Greens (England and Wales) … Rationale: Occam's Razor; current title is redundant as no other organisation in England and Wales has young greens in its name; for international purposes, the article's subject is known by the proposed title, never the existing one.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Young Greens of England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/staff/jenny_pickerill/publications has some info on this network. She interviewed self-identifying members in 1999 so it was in existence then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.23.158 ( talk) 13:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)