This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
You Lost Me article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | You Lost Me has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Bionic (Christina Aguilera album). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Page moved, histories preserved. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
You Lost Me (Christina Aguilera song) →
You Lost Me — I had already moved this page to "You Lost Me" but someone decided to remake the article here.
12345abcxyz20082009 (
talk)
17:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of You Lost Me (Christina Aguilera song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BB":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
As you see here, You Lost Me didn't even reach the Top 100 in Germany in in its scheduled debuting week (sales from week August 30, 2010 to September 05, 2010). I think that should be mentioned in the article! -- 79.216.218.63 ( talk) 21:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
In the article, it says that YLM has been released as the final single from the album. Is there a source confirming this because I believe he plans to continue promotion of Bionic once she is done promoting Burlesque and starts preparing for the Bionic Tour. Jpagan09 ( talk) 19:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I am starting a discussion here since there is some disagreement about which cover images should be used in the infobox. We have had some editors chose one image over the image while a third group has advocated for using both. I have added back the other imag, so we can have time to reach a consensus instead of it being deleted as being an orphaned fair use image.
I think both cover images should be used since an alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed passes WP:NFCC. Aspects ( talk) 13:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
So it absolutely violates most terms of copyrighted material, the image shown in the second one is also a shot of the music video, which is already documented with its own similar copyrighted picture. Literally I cannot be bothered to go on... (but thanks for opening a discussion :D) -- FeuDeJoie ( talk) 17:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Damn, I'm late in this. I think the other cover should be used (the one that was deleted) per Womanizer (song), where the physical cover is used rather than the digital cover. — Status { talk contribs 00:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Calvin999 ( talk · contribs) 17:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Sorry but failing. The lead alone is poorly written with basic grammar and spelling mistake issues. It is boring to read and not engaging. Picking out an issue at random from the rest of the article: "Set at 50 beats per minute, it is categorized in genres" is also written poorly. I suggest you get someone from the guild of copy editors to go over the article, or ask some other friends or editors who are uninvolved with the article to help you. Considering they have also contributed greatly to the article, perhaps ask User:Status or User:Lil-unique1. AARON• TALK 17:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of You Lost Me's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "musicomh":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
You Lost Me article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | You Lost Me has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Bionic (Christina Aguilera album). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Page moved, histories preserved. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:03, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
You Lost Me (Christina Aguilera song) →
You Lost Me — I had already moved this page to "You Lost Me" but someone decided to remake the article here.
12345abcxyz20082009 (
talk)
17:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of You Lost Me (Christina Aguilera song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BB":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
As you see here, You Lost Me didn't even reach the Top 100 in Germany in in its scheduled debuting week (sales from week August 30, 2010 to September 05, 2010). I think that should be mentioned in the article! -- 79.216.218.63 ( talk) 21:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
In the article, it says that YLM has been released as the final single from the album. Is there a source confirming this because I believe he plans to continue promotion of Bionic once she is done promoting Burlesque and starts preparing for the Bionic Tour. Jpagan09 ( talk) 19:10, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I am starting a discussion here since there is some disagreement about which cover images should be used in the infobox. We have had some editors chose one image over the image while a third group has advocated for using both. I have added back the other imag, so we can have time to reach a consensus instead of it being deleted as being an orphaned fair use image.
I think both cover images should be used since an alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed passes WP:NFCC. Aspects ( talk) 13:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
So it absolutely violates most terms of copyrighted material, the image shown in the second one is also a shot of the music video, which is already documented with its own similar copyrighted picture. Literally I cannot be bothered to go on... (but thanks for opening a discussion :D) -- FeuDeJoie ( talk) 17:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Damn, I'm late in this. I think the other cover should be used (the one that was deleted) per Womanizer (song), where the physical cover is used rather than the digital cover. — Status { talk contribs 00:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Calvin999 ( talk · contribs) 17:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Sorry but failing. The lead alone is poorly written with basic grammar and spelling mistake issues. It is boring to read and not engaging. Picking out an issue at random from the rest of the article: "Set at 50 beats per minute, it is categorized in genres" is also written poorly. I suggest you get someone from the guild of copy editors to go over the article, or ask some other friends or editors who are uninvolved with the article to help you. Considering they have also contributed greatly to the article, perhaps ask User:Status or User:Lil-unique1. AARON• TALK 17:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of You Lost Me's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "musicomh":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)