![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Should we add something about that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.116.230 ( talk) 21:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Can youtube be used as a reference if it itself contains a news television bulletin where the news article cannot be found elsewhere online ? thanks 90.192.59.178 ( talk) 11:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
"The Adobe Flash Player plug-in is installed on 98% of personal computer browsers and accounts for almost 75% of online video material.[56]" The BBC reffers to Adobe back, is this an accurate source? -- 213.168.120.127 ( talk) 21:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
The Shows feature is not worth an entire section. Also, it contains too much detail of interest only to UK readers, and requires sourcing to explain the significance. Also, please assume good faith and do not misuse the vandalism template, as happened on my talk page.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
The "Shows" feature is currently available only in the UK.
[6]. It is worth mentioning, but requires sourcing.--
♦IanMacM♦
(talk to me)
12:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
How about that; since when did they offer that? http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/11/1080p-hd-comes-to-youtube.html 192.156.234.170 ( talk) 04:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Why is there a section under "Criticism" called "Criticism of court ruling"? Shouldn't all criticisms be relative to YouTube? Since when does the judge ordering YouTube to give Viacom 12 terabytes of data qualify as a criticism of YouTube? It's not like YouTube wanted to hand over that information. I agree that it's falls under controversy because of privacy concerns, so should this court ruling be moved elsewhere in the article and renamed? Or is this one of those situations where we're better off to leave it alone in order to avoid more confusion? 24.10.181.254 ( talk) 20:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was consensus against move — æk Talk 07:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
YouTube →
Youtube — Per
WP:MOSTM.
Trademarks that are rendered in uppercase as a matter of corporate policy rather than because of an underlying linguistic reason are to be converted to the same regular sentence case that any other proper noun would appear in. --
Labattblueboy (
talk)
20:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.Close - Move for speedy close with No move -- Jubilee♫ clipman 04:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't advertising on YouTube be mentioned? Since it was bought by Google, YouTube has been heavily advertised on with in-vidio advertisements, in-video pop-up ads, and ads on the sides of the screens. I think this was a big change for YouTube and should definitely be mentioned in the article. Wikipediarul e s 2221 23:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
YouTube is back at number 3 in the daily rankings [10] but is still at number 4 in the 3 month average, which is used as the traffic rank. I'll keep an eye out to see if the article needs updating.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
When YouTube will be able to show ( NON USA users the TV shows and some of the Famous USA TV channel for Free, i think they can do a good deal for their viewers with those big TV channels and i m sure they would love that to get more viewers but this time international viewers as we all know some countries block the USA TV channels for some crazy reasons , hope i can see that happening one day [ [11]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.235.36 ( talk) 09:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't this article include the true inventor controversy? 98.111.199.195 ( talk) 22:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't the "Quality and codecs" section mention more about the audio? Before HD was common on YouTube, this article mentioned audio bit rates (kbps) for each quality setting. Is there any particular reason that it's missing?
Oh, also, I'd add it myself, except I can't find any information on the audio bit rate for 720p or 1080p. If I was going off of memory (which obviously isn't a good source), 720p had an 44.1 khz audio bit rate of 232 kbps (and stereo), 480p (which used to be called "HQ" on YouTube) was like 44.1 khz, stereo, 128 kbps I think, and 360p was either 22,050 hz @ 96 or 64 kbps (depending on possibly being before or after February 2008), as well as either mono or stereo. I never recall running across anything about 1080p. I think this would be worth looking into if someone knows where to look, because I'm thinking at least one aspect of what I just stated is incorrect. Any input would be appreciated.
24.10.181.254 (
talk)
21:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Although the article still gives the local web addresses, eg http://www.uk.youtube.com for the UK, it seems that these no longer work. Can anyone confirm this, because the article may need updating here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Looks like you can't have multiple accounts anymore since they manditorily connected your google account to youtube. so you'd have to make several emails to do it. i used to have like 20 useless accounts on my same email. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 09:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Old settings limited to two or three choices only:
New settings have a different level of flexibility:
I notice that it is already acknowledged in the new "Charlie bit my finger" image, although the Barack Obama picture still appears to use the old screenshots. 142.26.18.188 ( talk) 18:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Change current youtube media table with this new youtube media table with all fmt (also the old).
Please add to the main page.
Standard | Medium | High | 720p | 1080p | Mobile | Old formats (pre Feb 2009) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard | High | Mobile | ||||||||
fmt value | 34 | 18 | 35 | 22 | 37 | 17 | 0, 5 | 6 | 13 | |
Container | FLV | MP4 | FLV | MP4 | 3GP | FLV | 3GP | |||
Video | Encoding | MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) | MPEG-4 Visual | H.263 | ||||||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 16:9 | 16:9 | 11:9 | 4:3 | 11:9 | |||||
Max Resolution | 320×240 400×226 640×360 |
480×270 480×360 |
640×480 854×480 |
1280×720 | 1920×1080 | 176×144 | 320×240 | 480×360 | 176×144 | |
Audio | Encoding | AAC | MP3 | AMR | ||||||
Channels | 2 (stereo) | 1 (mono) | ||||||||
Sampling rate (Hz) | 44100 | 22050 | 44100 | 8000 |
Sources: http://www.net.chanun.com/tips/download-high-quality-videos-from-youtube, http://userscripts.org/topics/38520, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:YouTube/Archive_12, current youtube media type table, my experience and some google search —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.177.173.11 ( talk) 14:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Done Welcome and thanks for improving that table. It would be better to find authoritative sources for this information, but most of the content was already provided in the previous table, so I made the change as an improvement of the presentation. Hopefully, anyone challenging parts of your table will further improve it and not simply revert. Thanks again,
Celestra (
talk)
22:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be helpful to have an example video on the wikipedia page? or a link to one
Like they do here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murdock129 ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Should we add something about that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.116.230 ( talk) 21:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Can youtube be used as a reference if it itself contains a news television bulletin where the news article cannot be found elsewhere online ? thanks 90.192.59.178 ( talk) 11:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
"The Adobe Flash Player plug-in is installed on 98% of personal computer browsers and accounts for almost 75% of online video material.[56]" The BBC reffers to Adobe back, is this an accurate source? -- 213.168.120.127 ( talk) 21:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
The Shows feature is not worth an entire section. Also, it contains too much detail of interest only to UK readers, and requires sourcing to explain the significance. Also, please assume good faith and do not misuse the vandalism template, as happened on my talk page.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
The "Shows" feature is currently available only in the UK.
[6]. It is worth mentioning, but requires sourcing.--
♦IanMacM♦
(talk to me)
12:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
How about that; since when did they offer that? http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/11/1080p-hd-comes-to-youtube.html 192.156.234.170 ( talk) 04:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Why is there a section under "Criticism" called "Criticism of court ruling"? Shouldn't all criticisms be relative to YouTube? Since when does the judge ordering YouTube to give Viacom 12 terabytes of data qualify as a criticism of YouTube? It's not like YouTube wanted to hand over that information. I agree that it's falls under controversy because of privacy concerns, so should this court ruling be moved elsewhere in the article and renamed? Or is this one of those situations where we're better off to leave it alone in order to avoid more confusion? 24.10.181.254 ( talk) 20:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
The result of the move request was consensus against move — æk Talk 07:12, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
YouTube →
Youtube — Per
WP:MOSTM.
Trademarks that are rendered in uppercase as a matter of corporate policy rather than because of an underlying linguistic reason are to be converted to the same regular sentence case that any other proper noun would appear in. --
Labattblueboy (
talk)
20:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.Close - Move for speedy close with No move -- Jubilee♫ clipman 04:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't advertising on YouTube be mentioned? Since it was bought by Google, YouTube has been heavily advertised on with in-vidio advertisements, in-video pop-up ads, and ads on the sides of the screens. I think this was a big change for YouTube and should definitely be mentioned in the article. Wikipediarul e s 2221 23:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
YouTube is back at number 3 in the daily rankings [10] but is still at number 4 in the 3 month average, which is used as the traffic rank. I'll keep an eye out to see if the article needs updating.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
When YouTube will be able to show ( NON USA users the TV shows and some of the Famous USA TV channel for Free, i think they can do a good deal for their viewers with those big TV channels and i m sure they would love that to get more viewers but this time international viewers as we all know some countries block the USA TV channels for some crazy reasons , hope i can see that happening one day [ [11]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.235.36 ( talk) 09:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't this article include the true inventor controversy? 98.111.199.195 ( talk) 22:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't the "Quality and codecs" section mention more about the audio? Before HD was common on YouTube, this article mentioned audio bit rates (kbps) for each quality setting. Is there any particular reason that it's missing?
Oh, also, I'd add it myself, except I can't find any information on the audio bit rate for 720p or 1080p. If I was going off of memory (which obviously isn't a good source), 720p had an 44.1 khz audio bit rate of 232 kbps (and stereo), 480p (which used to be called "HQ" on YouTube) was like 44.1 khz, stereo, 128 kbps I think, and 360p was either 22,050 hz @ 96 or 64 kbps (depending on possibly being before or after February 2008), as well as either mono or stereo. I never recall running across anything about 1080p. I think this would be worth looking into if someone knows where to look, because I'm thinking at least one aspect of what I just stated is incorrect. Any input would be appreciated.
24.10.181.254 (
talk)
21:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Although the article still gives the local web addresses, eg http://www.uk.youtube.com for the UK, it seems that these no longer work. Can anyone confirm this, because the article may need updating here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Looks like you can't have multiple accounts anymore since they manditorily connected your google account to youtube. so you'd have to make several emails to do it. i used to have like 20 useless accounts on my same email. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 09:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Old settings limited to two or three choices only:
New settings have a different level of flexibility:
I notice that it is already acknowledged in the new "Charlie bit my finger" image, although the Barack Obama picture still appears to use the old screenshots. 142.26.18.188 ( talk) 18:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Change current youtube media table with this new youtube media table with all fmt (also the old).
Please add to the main page.
Standard | Medium | High | 720p | 1080p | Mobile | Old formats (pre Feb 2009) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard | High | Mobile | ||||||||
fmt value | 34 | 18 | 35 | 22 | 37 | 17 | 0, 5 | 6 | 13 | |
Container | FLV | MP4 | FLV | MP4 | 3GP | FLV | 3GP | |||
Video | Encoding | MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) | MPEG-4 Visual | H.263 | ||||||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 16:9 | 16:9 | 11:9 | 4:3 | 11:9 | |||||
Max Resolution | 320×240 400×226 640×360 |
480×270 480×360 |
640×480 854×480 |
1280×720 | 1920×1080 | 176×144 | 320×240 | 480×360 | 176×144 | |
Audio | Encoding | AAC | MP3 | AMR | ||||||
Channels | 2 (stereo) | 1 (mono) | ||||||||
Sampling rate (Hz) | 44100 | 22050 | 44100 | 8000 |
Sources: http://www.net.chanun.com/tips/download-high-quality-videos-from-youtube, http://userscripts.org/topics/38520, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:YouTube/Archive_12, current youtube media type table, my experience and some google search —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.177.173.11 ( talk) 14:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Done Welcome and thanks for improving that table. It would be better to find authoritative sources for this information, but most of the content was already provided in the previous table, so I made the change as an improvement of the presentation. Hopefully, anyone challenging parts of your table will further improve it and not simply revert. Thanks again,
Celestra (
talk)
22:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be helpful to have an example video on the wikipedia page? or a link to one
Like they do here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murdock129 ( talk • contribs) 18:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)