This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
I've removed a lot of material from the article, including spam links that are clearly part of black hat SEO practice. Also, websites used as sources don't seem to be
notable. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FinanceManToo (
talk •
contribs) 02:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you for starting the convo, Jo-Jo. I strongly favor such a repurposing, and am interested if there's any opposition and what the arguments against might be. Certainly in a restructured entry we'd make proper mention of the company + founder, but IMO the encyclopedia would be better served by an article focused on the much acclaimed, oft written about plugin, rather than the company (for which I can't find significant RS).
Pegnawl (
talk) 23:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
It should be about both. Its fine the way it is now.
DreamFocus 23:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I agree with Dream Focus. I like the article as it is.
Lightburst (
talk) 01:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I know this more as a plugin than a company, but would support both. I think the plugin alone merits a Wiki entry.
Stefka Bulgaria (
talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Plugin
In advance of being brave and since this discussion has already started, take a look at
this repurposed page which focuses on the plug-in. Feel free edit as appropriate.
HighKing++ 18:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the feedback so far on the page. Feel free to edit the sandbox page to make corrections. I aim to put it live early next week.
HighKing++ 12:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)reply
OK. Feedback appears to have dried up now and I suppose the plug-in focussed article is ready to go. I propose to put it live now and feedback/edits can continue on the live article.
HighKing++ 19:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the
Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
I've removed a lot of material from the article, including spam links that are clearly part of black hat SEO practice. Also, websites used as sources don't seem to be
notable. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
FinanceManToo (
talk •
contribs) 02:13, 10 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you for starting the convo, Jo-Jo. I strongly favor such a repurposing, and am interested if there's any opposition and what the arguments against might be. Certainly in a restructured entry we'd make proper mention of the company + founder, but IMO the encyclopedia would be better served by an article focused on the much acclaimed, oft written about plugin, rather than the company (for which I can't find significant RS).
Pegnawl (
talk) 23:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
It should be about both. Its fine the way it is now.
DreamFocus 23:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I agree with Dream Focus. I like the article as it is.
Lightburst (
talk) 01:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I know this more as a plugin than a company, but would support both. I think the plugin alone merits a Wiki entry.
Stefka Bulgaria (
talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Plugin
In advance of being brave and since this discussion has already started, take a look at
this repurposed page which focuses on the plug-in. Feel free edit as appropriate.
HighKing++ 18:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the feedback so far on the page. Feel free to edit the sandbox page to make corrections. I aim to put it live early next week.
HighKing++ 12:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)reply
OK. Feedback appears to have dried up now and I suppose the plug-in focussed article is ready to go. I propose to put it live now and feedback/edits can continue on the live article.
HighKing++ 19:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)reply