![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources."
Many of the claims made in this article are entirely lacking the sources required. As a courtesy, I am going to wait 24 hours before removing all the unsourced guff about how much the subject's artworks sold for, the praise from 'prominent officeholders' etc. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, and unless such claims can be backed up by the third party reliable sources that Wikipedia requires, they will be deleted. 86.128.242.23 ( talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
So why is the fact this claim is not accepted by all Buddhists not relevant? Slatersteven ( talk) 13:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because the article is well sourced and neutral in tone. NPalgan2 ( talk) 23:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons: "Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed. This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, and whether it is in a biography or in some other article. Material should not be added to an article when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism. When material is both verifiable and noteworthy, it will have appeared in more reliable sources."
Many of the claims made in this article are entirely lacking the sources required. As a courtesy, I am going to wait 24 hours before removing all the unsourced guff about how much the subject's artworks sold for, the praise from 'prominent officeholders' etc. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, and unless such claims can be backed up by the third party reliable sources that Wikipedia requires, they will be deleted. 86.128.242.23 ( talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
So why is the fact this claim is not accepted by all Buddhists not relevant? Slatersteven ( talk) 13:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because the article is well sourced and neutral in tone. NPalgan2 ( talk) 23:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)