This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This school is unusual and could be important. Tell us more about it and include refs and more topics Victuallers 22:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
You cannot be under the auspices of someoe who is dead as a matter of fact. Does anyone dissagree with me? If no-one gives a good reason then the protection should be removed and the page should be changed to my version 58.175.200.65 11:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm concerned about Yeshivah College, Australia#Sexual Abuse Scandal... While the controversy probably deserves mentioning, I think that expending so many words on it is starting to tip the scales towards scandal-mongering and is beginning to affect the neutral tone of the article.
I've removed the point about Lisa Metcher's statement that the local Jewish community protected the abusers. I think that this is a bit too WP:FRINGE and probably doesn't relate close enough to the subject of the article.
I'm raising this issue at WP:WPSCH and WP:EIA for their input also. ˜ danjel[ talk | contribs ] 00:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
I removed the Shluchim from under the curriculum heading into its own section. Don't see how they are connected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unchartered ( talk • contribs) 12:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This school is unusual and could be important. Tell us more about it and include refs and more topics Victuallers 22:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
You cannot be under the auspices of someoe who is dead as a matter of fact. Does anyone dissagree with me? If no-one gives a good reason then the protection should be removed and the page should be changed to my version 58.175.200.65 11:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm concerned about Yeshivah College, Australia#Sexual Abuse Scandal... While the controversy probably deserves mentioning, I think that expending so many words on it is starting to tip the scales towards scandal-mongering and is beginning to affect the neutral tone of the article.
I've removed the point about Lisa Metcher's statement that the local Jewish community protected the abusers. I think that this is a bit too WP:FRINGE and probably doesn't relate close enough to the subject of the article.
I'm raising this issue at WP:WPSCH and WP:EIA for their input also. ˜ danjel[ talk | contribs ] 00:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
I removed the Shluchim from under the curriculum heading into its own section. Don't see how they are connected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unchartered ( talk • contribs) 12:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)