![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How can we help in cleaning up the page? Like, is there any section which is not relevent in the article or are there any other specific issue? -- bkris 20:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestions Postdlf
-- bkris 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed a large amount of content from the article that I felt was not encyclopedic in nature, but more like a travel guide, per WP:NOTTRAVEL. For reference, here is a link to the old version, in case anything can be reincorporated in a manner more fitting for an encyclopedia article, or be used to add to the relevant WikiTravel page. Dancter ( talk) 17:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Yet another big removal of travel brochure material, the old version which can be reviewed here. Dancter ( talk) 18:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I have removed many of the pictures in an effort to encyclopedize it. Feel free to revert if you feel it is necessary.-- Anon423 ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
This article has been tagged for copy editing, and as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I have attempted a cleanup. However, there are many confusing points on which I cannot proceed without clarification:
I have marked these instances in the wikitext using html comments. If you can answer these questions, simply go into the actual page text and fix it there yourself. Don't answer here and have someone else put it into the article.
Also, there are too many pictures, and it seems that it was written as a travel guide.-- Anon423 ( talk) 20:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
| A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{ copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
-- Anon423 ( talk) 21:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I am improving this article please dont make any major changes. thanks for understanding. 72.138.118.191 ( talk) 20:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How can we help in cleaning up the page? Like, is there any section which is not relevent in the article or are there any other specific issue? -- bkris 20:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestions Postdlf
-- bkris 16:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
I removed a large amount of content from the article that I felt was not encyclopedic in nature, but more like a travel guide, per WP:NOTTRAVEL. For reference, here is a link to the old version, in case anything can be reincorporated in a manner more fitting for an encyclopedia article, or be used to add to the relevant WikiTravel page. Dancter ( talk) 17:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Yet another big removal of travel brochure material, the old version which can be reviewed here. Dancter ( talk) 18:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I have removed many of the pictures in an effort to encyclopedize it. Feel free to revert if you feel it is necessary.-- Anon423 ( talk) 20:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
This article has been tagged for copy editing, and as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I have attempted a cleanup. However, there are many confusing points on which I cannot proceed without clarification:
I have marked these instances in the wikitext using html comments. If you can answer these questions, simply go into the actual page text and fix it there yourself. Don't answer here and have someone else put it into the article.
Also, there are too many pictures, and it seems that it was written as a travel guide.-- Anon423 ( talk) 20:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
| A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{ copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
-- Anon423 ( talk) 21:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I am improving this article please dont make any major changes. thanks for understanding. 72.138.118.191 ( talk) 20:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)