This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Think break article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The yeah comes first, then the woo. Clearly heard in the sample. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.82 ( talk) 14:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the article on this break should be merged with the article on the song it comes from, " Think (About It)". InnocuousPseudonym ( talk) 04:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Would it make sense to change the title to "Yeah! Woo!" by switching the order of the words? Because if you listen to the beat from the start, "yeah!" comes out first. But if you suddenly listen from the middle, it could feel like "woo!" was first. UD34 ( talk) 05:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I noticed an editor has changed the title from "Woo! Yeah!" to "Yeah! Woo!" Thanks for the approval. UD34 ( talk)
This move was done again and undiscussed. The source material is "Yeah!" then "Woo!". The sample that is popular, and the subject of the article, is "Woo!" then "Yeah!". This shouldn't be moved and reversed in article text, without discussion of why the source is more important than the subject. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk) 13:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
That's what it sounds like to me. I can't hear "Wooo! Yeah!" or "Yeah! Wooo!" in this. 66.25.177.117 ( talk) 21:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
A complete listing of every song to sample "Think (About It)" would list over 2,000 songs, if WhoSampled is any indication. It doesn't add anything to the article and seems more like a trivia section than anything else - notable examples of the break can be (and are) listed in the article itself. I've removed the list because of this. The main relevant article I can find on this is WP:PLOT. Jokullmusic 16:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jokullmusic ( talk • contribs)
The consensus is that the "Songs that use either all or part of the song" list section should have criteria for inclusion but there is no consensus about what the inclusion criteria should be.
Should this article include a dynamic, 100+ entry list of tracks that use this break, or incorporate notable uses of the break into the article itself? Jokullmusic 19:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
This page was moved and retitled "Woo! Yeah!" a few years ago. Why? It's definitely "Yeah! Woo!" in the sample, in that order. Was this a sneaky sort of vandalism which has gone unnoticed?
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Think break." ( closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 18:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Woo! Yeah! →
Think Break – "Woo! Yeah!" feels non-descriptive, when amongst producers and writing it's pretty much referred to as the Think Break.
⠀TOMÁSTOMÁSTOMÁS⠀
TALK⠀
19:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
There is another notable sample taken from the same song - at about 1:34 in the original - that is popular in genres like Liquid DnB, Breakcore or other Breaks subgenres, and is sometimes also referred to by the name "Think break". This is especially notable, as like with the "Yeah, Woo!", there is a little vocal tick, that is very characteristic in the tracks that use this sample. An example would be Solitary Native by Alix Perez & Sabre (first heard at 0:46, a bit low in the mix). There are probably more notable examples, but I'm not an expert on the genre. You can also find the loop under the name "Think break" in online databases like on https://samplefocus.com/samples/think-original-break-loop . A reliable citation is https://www.whosampled.com/news/2017/08/29/a-brief-history-of-the-think-break-the-funk-classic-sampled-2000-times/ , which lists the specific sample in question as ocurring at 1:37 in the original song. -- LonleyGhost ( talk) 15:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Think break article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The yeah comes first, then the woo. Clearly heard in the sample. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.82 ( talk) 14:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the article on this break should be merged with the article on the song it comes from, " Think (About It)". InnocuousPseudonym ( talk) 04:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Would it make sense to change the title to "Yeah! Woo!" by switching the order of the words? Because if you listen to the beat from the start, "yeah!" comes out first. But if you suddenly listen from the middle, it could feel like "woo!" was first. UD34 ( talk) 05:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I noticed an editor has changed the title from "Woo! Yeah!" to "Yeah! Woo!" Thanks for the approval. UD34 ( talk)
This move was done again and undiscussed. The source material is "Yeah!" then "Woo!". The sample that is popular, and the subject of the article, is "Woo!" then "Yeah!". This shouldn't be moved and reversed in article text, without discussion of why the source is more important than the subject. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk) 13:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
That's what it sounds like to me. I can't hear "Wooo! Yeah!" or "Yeah! Wooo!" in this. 66.25.177.117 ( talk) 21:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
A complete listing of every song to sample "Think (About It)" would list over 2,000 songs, if WhoSampled is any indication. It doesn't add anything to the article and seems more like a trivia section than anything else - notable examples of the break can be (and are) listed in the article itself. I've removed the list because of this. The main relevant article I can find on this is WP:PLOT. Jokullmusic 16:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jokullmusic ( talk • contribs)
The consensus is that the "Songs that use either all or part of the song" list section should have criteria for inclusion but there is no consensus about what the inclusion criteria should be.
Should this article include a dynamic, 100+ entry list of tracks that use this break, or incorporate notable uses of the break into the article itself? Jokullmusic 19:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
This page was moved and retitled "Woo! Yeah!" a few years ago. Why? It's definitely "Yeah! Woo!" in the sample, in that order. Was this a sneaky sort of vandalism which has gone unnoticed?
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Think break." ( closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 18:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Woo! Yeah! →
Think Break – "Woo! Yeah!" feels non-descriptive, when amongst producers and writing it's pretty much referred to as the Think Break.
⠀TOMÁSTOMÁSTOMÁS⠀
TALK⠀
19:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
There is another notable sample taken from the same song - at about 1:34 in the original - that is popular in genres like Liquid DnB, Breakcore or other Breaks subgenres, and is sometimes also referred to by the name "Think break". This is especially notable, as like with the "Yeah, Woo!", there is a little vocal tick, that is very characteristic in the tracks that use this sample. An example would be Solitary Native by Alix Perez & Sabre (first heard at 0:46, a bit low in the mix). There are probably more notable examples, but I'm not an expert on the genre. You can also find the loop under the name "Think break" in online databases like on https://samplefocus.com/samples/think-original-break-loop . A reliable citation is https://www.whosampled.com/news/2017/08/29/a-brief-history-of-the-think-break-the-funk-classic-sampled-2000-times/ , which lists the specific sample in question as ocurring at 1:37 in the original song. -- LonleyGhost ( talk) 15:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)