This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ycuá Bolaños supermarket fire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on Septemer 5, 2006. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. |
On 31 March 2013, Ycuá Bolaños supermarket fire was linked from reddit, a high-traffic website. ( Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 1, 2018. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Regarding JD's removal, I think the point is there were likely hundreds of people who helped out the victims, so what makes Rodriguez notable? (other than he's connected to your 9/11 Truth stuff, which is irrelevant here). -- ZimZalaBim ( talk) 12:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
275 people die and the article becomes 9/11 conspiracy theory advertising????? This is just beyond all belief. Some human decency, pretty please? Weregerbil 19:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Let's just make something clear here. Rodriguez isn't some guy who contributed $20 on PayPal. He quit his job to organize fundraising efforts, and then flew to Paraguay to distribute those funds. There's no conceivable NPOV reason that the relief provided by the Buddhist monks is notable but the relief provided by Rodriguez is not. Excluding someone for their political beliefs is not NPOV.
It seems to me that Rodriguez' charitable activities should be on Rodriguez' page, not on the page of the target of his generosity. Otherwise it looks like his supporters are using his contribution to promote his cause. Tom Harrison Talk 12:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
This is ridiculous. A tragic event is no place to promote 9/11 conspiracy theory propaganda. Morton devonshire 15:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone else not see the Paraguay-stub template in this diff? Tom Harrison Talk 12:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
The fact is that this is a page that only five editors are looking at, three of whom generally appear to be of the opinion that information about 9/11 Conspiracy Theories should be minimized, one of whom was invited to monitor the page by User:Jersey Devil [1], and me. I could certainly follow Jersey Devil's lead and invite people likely to share my opinion to monitor this page, but I have no desire to intensify this edit war. I think that sticking up an NPOV tag is the best option; it has the possibility of attracing disinterested editors who can independently evaluate the notability of the Uruguayan government, the Tzu Chi Foundation, and William Rodriguez. -- Hyperbole 03:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Notable sources say he played a role. Why should he be excluded? I see no reason to do so, and unless anyone can cite policy based reason to exclude him, I will add him tomorrow. He will stay per policy unless you can demonstrate why his sourced role should not. · XP · 05:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I have just created this article in the Spanish Wiki. It's longer than this whit more information, if you want add something here. Greetings! Rakela 05:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I would really like to see this article improved. So I will be doing some work on it. Anyone who feels like helping feel free to join in. It would be much appreciated if someone could find an image with appropriate copyright! :P -- Kuzwa ( talk) 18:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ycuá Bolaños supermarket fire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on Septemer 5, 2006. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn. |
On 31 March 2013, Ycuá Bolaños supermarket fire was linked from reddit, a high-traffic website. ( Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 1, 2018. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Regarding JD's removal, I think the point is there were likely hundreds of people who helped out the victims, so what makes Rodriguez notable? (other than he's connected to your 9/11 Truth stuff, which is irrelevant here). -- ZimZalaBim ( talk) 12:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
275 people die and the article becomes 9/11 conspiracy theory advertising????? This is just beyond all belief. Some human decency, pretty please? Weregerbil 19:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Let's just make something clear here. Rodriguez isn't some guy who contributed $20 on PayPal. He quit his job to organize fundraising efforts, and then flew to Paraguay to distribute those funds. There's no conceivable NPOV reason that the relief provided by the Buddhist monks is notable but the relief provided by Rodriguez is not. Excluding someone for their political beliefs is not NPOV.
It seems to me that Rodriguez' charitable activities should be on Rodriguez' page, not on the page of the target of his generosity. Otherwise it looks like his supporters are using his contribution to promote his cause. Tom Harrison Talk 12:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
This is ridiculous. A tragic event is no place to promote 9/11 conspiracy theory propaganda. Morton devonshire 15:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone else not see the Paraguay-stub template in this diff? Tom Harrison Talk 12:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
The fact is that this is a page that only five editors are looking at, three of whom generally appear to be of the opinion that information about 9/11 Conspiracy Theories should be minimized, one of whom was invited to monitor the page by User:Jersey Devil [1], and me. I could certainly follow Jersey Devil's lead and invite people likely to share my opinion to monitor this page, but I have no desire to intensify this edit war. I think that sticking up an NPOV tag is the best option; it has the possibility of attracing disinterested editors who can independently evaluate the notability of the Uruguayan government, the Tzu Chi Foundation, and William Rodriguez. -- Hyperbole 03:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Notable sources say he played a role. Why should he be excluded? I see no reason to do so, and unless anyone can cite policy based reason to exclude him, I will add him tomorrow. He will stay per policy unless you can demonstrate why his sourced role should not. · XP · 05:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I have just created this article in the Spanish Wiki. It's longer than this whit more information, if you want add something here. Greetings! Rakela 05:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I would really like to see this article improved. So I will be doing some work on it. Anyone who feels like helping feel free to join in. It would be much appreciated if someone could find an image with appropriate copyright! :P -- Kuzwa ( talk) 18:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)