Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 21 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Yantacaw Brook. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve
New Jersey–related articles to
Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the
discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
There is no reason to repeat material about brook in park section. There is no reason to ad redundant information in infobox. There is no reason to keep dead links. There is no basis for keeping OR.
Djflem (
talk)
22:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
It is my understandng that people read what they are adding to Wikipedia. Once you've reviewed the entire article, can you get back to this talk page about why you would believe the information you're adding is relevent, useful, helpful, interesting, correctly placed, referenced, etc. Please explain how it is an addtion/improvement to the piece and not just a repetition of what is already in it? Thanks
Djflem (
talk)
22:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 21 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Yantacaw Brook. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve
New Jersey–related articles to
Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the
discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
There is no reason to repeat material about brook in park section. There is no reason to ad redundant information in infobox. There is no reason to keep dead links. There is no basis for keeping OR.
Djflem (
talk)
22:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
It is my understandng that people read what they are adding to Wikipedia. Once you've reviewed the entire article, can you get back to this talk page about why you would believe the information you're adding is relevent, useful, helpful, interesting, correctly placed, referenced, etc. Please explain how it is an addtion/improvement to the piece and not just a repetition of what is already in it? Thanks
Djflem (
talk)
22:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply