Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thanks for your help on this, particularly with overlinking - some useful changes that had missed my proofing! Have changed a tense back to present as it deals with current endeavours - I'd forgotten to add reason for the removal of the tags - I believe my edit dealt with the issues presented by them, hence removal. Happy to talk more about the article to improve it. Beckettnoti ( talk) 16:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Rayman60 everyone starts somewhere and it's natural to start with things that you know. In this case my connected articles have been offering translation stubs of material previously not covered on English Wikipedia, e.g.
Museo Experimental el Eco and
Frida Escobedo. I would like to learn and improve.
Edwardx Can you please explain why this is the case so that we can improve it? I had tried to improve the sourcing of information for this Wiki as the original sources were quite limited. I am not really sure now and I am left confused, certain edits have been made regarding neutral language - e.g. YP being the first person to bear the title of CEO being rendered as YP being successor to JPJ - the two are separate pieces of information, surely better to include both? JPJ was Director of the galleries, not CEO.
Beckettnoti (
talk) 09:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
"She is the first person to bear this title. [1]" is a distinct piece of information to "She succeeded Julia Peyton-Jones who had been in charge for 25 years. [2]" - Julia Peyton-Jones bore the title of Director, the move towards having a CEO rather than a Director under the Yana Peel tenure is an important cultural shift. Perhaps both pieces of information should be included, but they are distinct pieces of information. Beckettnoti ( talk) 10:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Yana is a friend of mine and sent me some links to some updates that should probably be added. I won't do it myself due to the friendship conflict of interest.
A few further links which are likely useful:
There are other requests, and I could in theory make an email introduction to an experienced Wikipedian in good standing if you're interested in discussing those with her. I would say that the main request would be the COI tag at the top of the article (and the other ones) which could hopefully be removed after suitable work on the entry has been completed.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 12:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
According to this article in The Guardian. Yana Peel is a co-owner of the government spyware company NSO Group. This is more than noteworthy, but I feel a consensus is needed on how to add this to a living person's biographical page. -- 24.160.188.8 ( talk) 15:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. That she's missing from the site isn't evidence that she no longer holds a position. Is there a reference stating she left? |
Yana Peel no longer holds an advisory position on the V-A-C Foundation so this should be removed. She is not named on the V-A-C Website - http://www.v-a-c.ru/ Occasionalpedestrian ( talk) 08:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please remove the reference to her association with NSO group as this was redacted by the Guardian in 2020. To retain the relevant context please change this to:
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Let's change the article image to this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walpole_Future_of_British_Luxury_Summit_2021_0531.jpg
This one is more recent and a nicer photo.
Occasionalpedestrian ( talk) 09:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Yana has been named in The Walpole Power List Top 50 most influential people in British Luxury. We should add the following bullet point to the Awards and Honours list:
- The Walpole: Top 50 Most Influential People in British Luxury. [1]
This is a respected and notable award so it should be added to the Awards and Honours section of the article.
The Walpole Power List 2022
Occasionalpedestrian (
talk) 13:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References
Not done: Please note that the reference to the award is the website of the company that awarded the award (primary source). In order to add this award, it would need a good secondary source establishing its notability. Sciencefish ( talk) 18:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thanks for your help on this, particularly with overlinking - some useful changes that had missed my proofing! Have changed a tense back to present as it deals with current endeavours - I'd forgotten to add reason for the removal of the tags - I believe my edit dealt with the issues presented by them, hence removal. Happy to talk more about the article to improve it. Beckettnoti ( talk) 16:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Rayman60 everyone starts somewhere and it's natural to start with things that you know. In this case my connected articles have been offering translation stubs of material previously not covered on English Wikipedia, e.g.
Museo Experimental el Eco and
Frida Escobedo. I would like to learn and improve.
Edwardx Can you please explain why this is the case so that we can improve it? I had tried to improve the sourcing of information for this Wiki as the original sources were quite limited. I am not really sure now and I am left confused, certain edits have been made regarding neutral language - e.g. YP being the first person to bear the title of CEO being rendered as YP being successor to JPJ - the two are separate pieces of information, surely better to include both? JPJ was Director of the galleries, not CEO.
Beckettnoti (
talk) 09:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
"She is the first person to bear this title. [1]" is a distinct piece of information to "She succeeded Julia Peyton-Jones who had been in charge for 25 years. [2]" - Julia Peyton-Jones bore the title of Director, the move towards having a CEO rather than a Director under the Yana Peel tenure is an important cultural shift. Perhaps both pieces of information should be included, but they are distinct pieces of information. Beckettnoti ( talk) 10:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Yana is a friend of mine and sent me some links to some updates that should probably be added. I won't do it myself due to the friendship conflict of interest.
A few further links which are likely useful:
There are other requests, and I could in theory make an email introduction to an experienced Wikipedian in good standing if you're interested in discussing those with her. I would say that the main request would be the COI tag at the top of the article (and the other ones) which could hopefully be removed after suitable work on the entry has been completed.-- Jimbo Wales ( talk) 12:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
According to this article in The Guardian. Yana Peel is a co-owner of the government spyware company NSO Group. This is more than noteworthy, but I feel a consensus is needed on how to add this to a living person's biographical page. -- 24.160.188.8 ( talk) 15:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. That she's missing from the site isn't evidence that she no longer holds a position. Is there a reference stating she left? |
Yana Peel no longer holds an advisory position on the V-A-C Foundation so this should be removed. She is not named on the V-A-C Website - http://www.v-a-c.ru/ Occasionalpedestrian ( talk) 08:14, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please remove the reference to her association with NSO group as this was redacted by the Guardian in 2020. To retain the relevant context please change this to:
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Let's change the article image to this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walpole_Future_of_British_Luxury_Summit_2021_0531.jpg
This one is more recent and a nicer photo.
Occasionalpedestrian ( talk) 09:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Yana has been named in The Walpole Power List Top 50 most influential people in British Luxury. We should add the following bullet point to the Awards and Honours list:
- The Walpole: Top 50 Most Influential People in British Luxury. [1]
This is a respected and notable award so it should be added to the Awards and Honours section of the article.
The Walpole Power List 2022
Occasionalpedestrian (
talk) 13:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References
Not done: Please note that the reference to the award is the website of the company that awarded the award (primary source). In order to add this award, it would need a good secondary source establishing its notability. Sciencefish ( talk) 18:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)