This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the name "Yakima" a native one? It doesn't sound European, so I assume it is! Maybe the origin of the name is worth mentioning? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Francis ( talk • contribs) 14:50, December 24, 2003
Added the Issues and Interesting Links sections, as well as a list of suburbs Yakima has. Integrated the above comment regarding Yakima's name into the article. Added the Notable Roads section. I believe I am qualified to do so because I lived in the city for over 15 years and moved less than four months ago. -- Celestialnight 07:23, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Removed link to NWinfo.net - someone added a bit of commercialism here since it serves no purpose to the subject and no other businesses (non-informative on Yakima) are listed. Also added other national TV affiliates - don't think any should be listed as now we open the door to list every TV and Radio affiliate. Maybe they should be removed. User:hikingbert 17 Mar 2006
Does anyone know the dates of the recent retail problems downtown? The present article just identifies is as being "the past five years". Obviously a relative measurement like that isn't going to be useful ten years from now, but I can't correct it myself. Could someone who knows the years for those events make an edit there? -- January 16, 2007
The New York Times recently mentioned Yakima, WA, as the location of an NSA "listening post" for the west coast. I think this merits inclusion, but am not sure where it should go. Below is the citation from the NYTimes.com site: THE NATION: Private Lives; The Agency That Could Be Big Brother; December 25, 2005, Sunday; By JAMES BAMFORD (NYT); Week in Review Desk; Late Edition - Final, Section 4, Page 1, Column 5, 1715 words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.143.49 ( talk • contribs) 12:44, January 3, 2006
Suggestion: Two areas of particular social concern may be the number of homeless and the average income. When I compare census data for Yakima and Seattle, the Yakima income is nearly half. This source details other issues, such as drug dependency, homelessness, poverty and the like which are all significantly "high" compared to elsewhere in the nation. www.endhomelessness.org/files/591_file_YakimaCo_WA.pdf —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.115.184.69 (
talk)
23:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The table says December 1, 1883. The article says January 27, 1886. The former is when Yakima was founded in present-day Union Gap, WA and the latter is the incorporation of the town after it was moved north 4 miles. Essentially both dates are correct, but I propose January 27, 1886 be the normalized date and the official date for the table because I can remember the city's official centennial celebration happened in 1986. Although January 27, 1883 could perhaps also be mentioned in the article Rupertg 20:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Interestingly, here's a quote from the Washington state history page: "Mining History: On February 4, 1889, the town of Roslyn incorporated in Kittitas County, only to lose that status later in the year when Washington achieved statehood, and territorial incorporation laws were declared unconstitutional. The bustling mining town re-incorporated in 1890." My question being - has Yakima ever "re-incorporated"?
http://www.historylink.org/ If it did re-incorporate, what was the date of this? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.119.1.84 (
talk)
06:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Why isn't there a larger discussion about illegal immigration? Though not politically correct to acknowledge reality, every objective person who lives in this town is aware of the tremendous negative impact illegal immigration has had on our town. Our gangs? Not black, white, native american or asian, our gangs are mexican. The yakima public schools fail everyone because they are forced to spend so much of their resources on teaching english. The welfare office and emergency rooms? Overwelmed by illegal immigrants and their offspring. Illegal immigrants are not bad people, but they have certainly impacted our town in a negative fashion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.178.50.218 ( talk • contribs)
The fruit industry would disappear without illegals? Mythology, and nothing more. Growers would (and probably will) continue the mechanization process to eliminate their unskilled workforce. Grower profit margins might decrease a little but the fruit and vegetables would still get picked just as it did in the many decades before illegals came. If you are from Yakima then you know that up until the late 70's local kids were still being let out of some school districts (West Valley, Highland) for a few weeks to work the harvest. All of my relatives in my parents generation and grand parents generation either worked in the fields, the warehouses or both at different times in the lives. The reality of the illegal immigrant is that they are used solely because the are an easy to exploit employee (much like children) because they often lack any skills and are extremely desperate because their own attempt at democracy has failed. And the growers are more than happy to exploit a desperate and unskilled workforce that they can use to fatten their bottom line (think Grapes of Wrath).
Poverty has nothing to do with gangs, bad parenting has more to do with gangs than anything. Yakima has always been known for its high unemployment and yet the gangs didn't start here until the illegals starting permanently settling here in large numbers in the mid to late 80's. Even now, our gangs are made up almost completely of mexicans, and anyone who watches the local news or reads the local paper is well aware of that. Obviously, that can't be acknowledged here because the very concept stands in stark contrast to modern American "thinking," namely that, even if all gangs are mexican (often the children of illegal immigrants) we must find a way to blame that fact on poverty or racism in America- not mexican culture. Of course, it's perfectly acceptable to blame America in general or more specifically so-called "White" America for the problems of others as they (white americans)are, apparently, the only culture on the face of the earth who can be held morally responsible for any of their negative actions-real or imagined. Everyone else is off the hook, so much so in fact, that white Americans can be blamed even for the idiotic behavior (gang activity, etc.) of other races and cultures. And yet, given the choice between the societies they have created (latin America,etc.) and the society Americans have created, people vote with their feet as to who gets the society building thing right and who gets it wrong.
The farmers did just fine before all of the illegal immigration as well. Before the late 80's the high-school kids were hired to do the work. Now high-school kids can't get a summer job in the orchards because there are too many illegals to do the work, not because they wouldn't do the work. As for the school issue, its not an immigration problem....its an illegal immigration problem. The Yakima school systems are in very poor shape because if this, and all kids are suffering. I don't mean to sound so negative, but the facts are the facts. I still like my hometown, but its not what it used to be. Mrhyak 15:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I am changing: "Dave Edler, Former Major League Baseball Player, former anchor of KNDO evening news,City of Yakima Mayor, Pastor" to "Dave Edler, Former Major League Baseball Player, City of Yakima Mayor, Pastor" because Dave Ettl is the former anchor of KNDO evening news. Common mistake among Yakimaniacs. We in Spokane understand..... -- 67.185.75.97 20:48, 7 February 2007
Sorry, but no one from Yakima or a true 'Yakimaniac' would confuse Dave Edler with Dave Ettl. Not disrespect to either; they've both earned their individuality and those in Yakima know the difference. TheeBurnz ( talk) 03:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed there isn't anything about North Yakima - you know, what is now Union Gap? I'm pretty sure North Yakima and current-day Yakima is one of the most famous aspects of the city - the fact that the whole city was moved from one location to the other, and the hotel actually stayed open the whole trip! When I have time, I'll find the specs and edit it myself, but I was quite surprised that wasn't even in the trivia! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.189.199.180 ( talk) 21:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC).
"North Yakima" is Yakima. What is now Union Gap was "Yakima." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.11.241 ( talk) 06:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I've been watching the changes to this page for quite some time now, and something just doesn't sit right with me. I am not sure how to fix it, but I have a few ideas...
The overall tone of the article isn't consistent. It is often either very negative or excessively positive. I've especially noticed this in the Economy section. I'm the first to admit that Yakima has its share of economic and social problems, but the alternating edits by the "glass is half-empty" and "glass is half-full" contributors have turned it into a roller-coaster. It's almost starting to sound a bit like a debate between two people who disagree on how the economy should be handled.
Example (the negative): "In the last five years, three major department stores and an entire shopping mall have closed for business. While several theories to 'revitalize' the city's downtown have been put forth by civic leaders, none has proven effective."
Problem: The first statement is true (at least, it is until the events pass beyond the five-year-window of accuracy... might have already). The second statement is someone's negative opinion ("effective" is a subjective term in this case, and judging whether any scheme is or is not effective would depend on who you ask). For all we know, this contributor wouldn't consider any plan "effective" unless The Bon, Mervyns, Penneys and Nordstrom all came back to Downtown.
Example (the positive): "The early 2000s have seen the return to the downtown of the Sports Center Tavern, a local landmark, as well as the opening of The Hilton Garden Inn, The Speakeasy Bar, ... and The Barrel House. Developers are aiming for an early 2008 completion for condominiums in the Bon Marche building of the former Yakima Mall."
Problem: Reads like a promotion, not like an encyclopedia. The business names should probably be pulled, and the text rewritten to something more general like "In the early 2000s, Downtown Yakima showed some signs of returning life in the form of restaurants, hotels, pubs, and new housing." Being less specific also allows the article to be accurate for a longer period (if "The Lofts" is a bust and isn't finished, someone will have to edit it again). Oh, and "the return to the downtown of the Sports Center" is very awkwardly worded.
In view of that, I think the following ought to be considered: 1. Create a "Tourism" section and move everything related to it (like the trolleys) into that section. Write a paragraph or two in "Economy" on tourism's impact on it (if anyone's got figures for what wine tasting, outdoor recreation, the trolleys, etc contribute, that's where it should be). Conventions and their economic impact would be good subjects here, too. 2. Create a "Neighborhoods" section and add a subsection for Downtown. Describe the changes (rolling north from Yakima City, fires, booms, busts, the goal of transitioning from retail to urban neighborhood), why people go there. Other neighborhoods could be added as well, resulting in a more complete view of the city. 3. In "Economy", downtown could still be mentioned in the context of it's large employers, convention draw, etc. Maybe someone's got numbers as to how many people work there? 4. Get rid of the opinions, and clean up the dates (this "in the last five years" stuff has to go). 5. Create a "Social Issues" section (or some such thing) and move statements like the final paragraph of Economy (about illegal immigration) into it. The fact that the issue is debated in the press has nothing to do with the economy.
I've tried doing this myself, but ended throwing away the changes because it was too daunting a task. I figured changes as drastic as what I was attempting would end up getting undone by somebody. So I decided to share my plan with everyone, instead... Thoughts? -- 75.165.142.199 08:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I am sad to see the section about that ridiculous sign has been removed. As a Yakima resident I found it to be hilarious, and also vindicating, as it established that no one in our city's local goverment (past or present) had a part in that sign being erected. -- 66.189.197.220 06:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
The article has West Valley and Terrace Heights listed as unincorporated suburbs, but in fact they are neighborhoods right in Yakima. There was actually a debate a couple years back where residents wanted to make West Valley its own town but the motion was rejected and it remained a part of Yakima Proper. Kristamaranatha ( talk) 14:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
further note: a person from Yakima is not a Yakimaniac, as said on pollitcally incorrect children's show iCarly, it is YAKIMANIAN. Just thought I might let everybody know.
This section is out of control —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.91.198 ( talk) 08:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Seems this issue came during a time when a local, highly publicized person was involved in controversial issues. Stopping/deleting this section indefinitely discredits local residents who should recognized. Please consider republishing much of the established history that was previously documented and not let a blot in time remove their place in history. TheeBurnz ( talk) 03:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
What does it mean to say that "Yakima Valley soil... is very similar to the soil conditions of France"? France has a lot of different soil types. Which type, specifically, does Yakima have? I don't mean to sound overly critical, but this is really vague and just sounds self- congratulatory. Mikemikemikea ( talk) 08:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
The information on the (old grave pit) lakes on the north side of Yakima is a bit in error, but more amusing is Wikipedia's refusal to accept an objective edit informing readers of the largest (old gravel pit) lake in Yakima (50 acres, 120 feet deep), LL Buchanan Lake, on the east side of Yakima, within the City limits. The lake has its own website (BuchananLake.com), and three floating islands that have become acknowledged as the most commonly mentioned visual image of Yakima. Now, just who deleted the flawlessly factual and objective edit if there is no editorial board? Wikipedia has a growing sector of detractors pointing out verifiable errors and omissions that Wikipedia refuses to correct. It will require a few more decades for Wikipedia to become reliable for useful information. I hit the "Save" button on this once, by it did not appear on Wikipedia. I will try again. This comment was written by Doug@DougBuchanan.com. You can ask him any questions, and he will respond with the most accurate answer his mind can devise.
why not add the lake in the context of the neighboring arboretum? Fimbriata ( talk) 22:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
The passage following passage was contradictory, implying that Fort Simcoe was established in "1856" as a "cause" rather than a result of the "Yakama Indian War of 1858":
"The arrival of settlers and their conflicts with the natives resulted in the Yakama Indian War of 1858. The U.S. Army established Fort Simcoe in 1856 near present-day White Swan as a response to the uprising."
I changed this name of the war to the "Yakima War", linking to an existing article here and at the same time doing away with the dating problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jah59 ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I am going to attempt to clean up this article and would appreciate any feedback and collaboration.
Here are some the objectives, in no particular order:
As I plan to be bold, please post here if there are concerns. I'm specifically going to remove a fair amount of material lacking citations. MrX 18:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I have made a number of changes and updated most of the demographics. I have collapsed the climate data weather box and plan to completely move the media listings to appropriate category pages where they belong.
I am using the Spokane, Washington article as a prototype for this article, as it has an 'A' quality rating. MrX 16:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Did not see mention of the Yakima Valley Community Band and their Concerts in the Parks summer concerts program that has been ongoing for years? Yakima's first communinty band was the City of Yakima Band created in 1917. City of Yakima Band became the Yakima Elks Band. It disbanded and the Yakima Community Band was formed and later renamed Yakima Valley Community Band to encompass the broader area since musicians came from many parts of the Valley and concerts had begun to be performed around the Yakima Valley. The community band in Yakima has been an important part in having a group where woodwind, brass and percussion musicians can play and perform together and in providing Yakima with live entertainment. The Yakima Valley Community Band has around sixty five members and performs two indoor concerts during the Winter and Spring season with a five week summer concert series called Concerts in the Parks held out at Randall Park. The band also travel for three summer concerts to other locations such as the City of Selah and the City of Toppenish. Historically the band has traveled to numerous cities around the valley and the state of Washington with two oversea tours. One to Switzerland in 1996 and one to the United Kingdom in 1999. Website is yakimacommunityband.org and the current Band Director is Roger Finch. Associate Band Director is Dan Waldbaum. I am throwing this out here having noticed no mention was made of the community band history and current status of a community band in Yakima. Not sure what or where to go with this other that to start by posting this note here and now. Maybe someone more in the know will come along and pick up this ball and run with and hopefully will get inserting into the Wikipedia info on Yakima. Yakima Valley Community Band member and Eb Clarinetist. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pearbaron ( talk • contribs) 01:35, October 20, 2014
the following section contains no references, and appears to be entirely trivia. a film or book that centers on yakima, and shows the culture (or lack thereof) would be an appropriate listing. i put it herre in case someone feels a listing is truly relevant, and can then add a source, NOT just proof that the city is in the media, but that its presence is discussed. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 17:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Yakima, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Yakima, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
What is the relevavance of listing the Target shooting in the history section? This happens every weekend in Yakima TheBigRedTank ( talk) 18:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The section on bodies of water briefly mentions, "A 10-mile (16 km) walking and cycling trail, a park, and a wildlife sanctuary are located at the river's edge." This walking path is actually a 20 mile system of parks and pathways along the Naches and Yakima river. The Greenway is a huge part of the community and parts of it are a reclaimed dump. [2] https://www.yakimagreenway.org/ Farrisj6 ( talk) 01:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is the name "Yakima" a native one? It doesn't sound European, so I assume it is! Maybe the origin of the name is worth mentioning? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Francis ( talk • contribs) 14:50, December 24, 2003
Added the Issues and Interesting Links sections, as well as a list of suburbs Yakima has. Integrated the above comment regarding Yakima's name into the article. Added the Notable Roads section. I believe I am qualified to do so because I lived in the city for over 15 years and moved less than four months ago. -- Celestialnight 07:23, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Removed link to NWinfo.net - someone added a bit of commercialism here since it serves no purpose to the subject and no other businesses (non-informative on Yakima) are listed. Also added other national TV affiliates - don't think any should be listed as now we open the door to list every TV and Radio affiliate. Maybe they should be removed. User:hikingbert 17 Mar 2006
Does anyone know the dates of the recent retail problems downtown? The present article just identifies is as being "the past five years". Obviously a relative measurement like that isn't going to be useful ten years from now, but I can't correct it myself. Could someone who knows the years for those events make an edit there? -- January 16, 2007
The New York Times recently mentioned Yakima, WA, as the location of an NSA "listening post" for the west coast. I think this merits inclusion, but am not sure where it should go. Below is the citation from the NYTimes.com site: THE NATION: Private Lives; The Agency That Could Be Big Brother; December 25, 2005, Sunday; By JAMES BAMFORD (NYT); Week in Review Desk; Late Edition - Final, Section 4, Page 1, Column 5, 1715 words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.143.49 ( talk • contribs) 12:44, January 3, 2006
Suggestion: Two areas of particular social concern may be the number of homeless and the average income. When I compare census data for Yakima and Seattle, the Yakima income is nearly half. This source details other issues, such as drug dependency, homelessness, poverty and the like which are all significantly "high" compared to elsewhere in the nation. www.endhomelessness.org/files/591_file_YakimaCo_WA.pdf —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.115.184.69 (
talk)
23:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The table says December 1, 1883. The article says January 27, 1886. The former is when Yakima was founded in present-day Union Gap, WA and the latter is the incorporation of the town after it was moved north 4 miles. Essentially both dates are correct, but I propose January 27, 1886 be the normalized date and the official date for the table because I can remember the city's official centennial celebration happened in 1986. Although January 27, 1883 could perhaps also be mentioned in the article Rupertg 20:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Interestingly, here's a quote from the Washington state history page: "Mining History: On February 4, 1889, the town of Roslyn incorporated in Kittitas County, only to lose that status later in the year when Washington achieved statehood, and territorial incorporation laws were declared unconstitutional. The bustling mining town re-incorporated in 1890." My question being - has Yakima ever "re-incorporated"?
http://www.historylink.org/ If it did re-incorporate, what was the date of this? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.119.1.84 (
talk)
06:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Why isn't there a larger discussion about illegal immigration? Though not politically correct to acknowledge reality, every objective person who lives in this town is aware of the tremendous negative impact illegal immigration has had on our town. Our gangs? Not black, white, native american or asian, our gangs are mexican. The yakima public schools fail everyone because they are forced to spend so much of their resources on teaching english. The welfare office and emergency rooms? Overwelmed by illegal immigrants and their offspring. Illegal immigrants are not bad people, but they have certainly impacted our town in a negative fashion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.178.50.218 ( talk • contribs)
The fruit industry would disappear without illegals? Mythology, and nothing more. Growers would (and probably will) continue the mechanization process to eliminate their unskilled workforce. Grower profit margins might decrease a little but the fruit and vegetables would still get picked just as it did in the many decades before illegals came. If you are from Yakima then you know that up until the late 70's local kids were still being let out of some school districts (West Valley, Highland) for a few weeks to work the harvest. All of my relatives in my parents generation and grand parents generation either worked in the fields, the warehouses or both at different times in the lives. The reality of the illegal immigrant is that they are used solely because the are an easy to exploit employee (much like children) because they often lack any skills and are extremely desperate because their own attempt at democracy has failed. And the growers are more than happy to exploit a desperate and unskilled workforce that they can use to fatten their bottom line (think Grapes of Wrath).
Poverty has nothing to do with gangs, bad parenting has more to do with gangs than anything. Yakima has always been known for its high unemployment and yet the gangs didn't start here until the illegals starting permanently settling here in large numbers in the mid to late 80's. Even now, our gangs are made up almost completely of mexicans, and anyone who watches the local news or reads the local paper is well aware of that. Obviously, that can't be acknowledged here because the very concept stands in stark contrast to modern American "thinking," namely that, even if all gangs are mexican (often the children of illegal immigrants) we must find a way to blame that fact on poverty or racism in America- not mexican culture. Of course, it's perfectly acceptable to blame America in general or more specifically so-called "White" America for the problems of others as they (white americans)are, apparently, the only culture on the face of the earth who can be held morally responsible for any of their negative actions-real or imagined. Everyone else is off the hook, so much so in fact, that white Americans can be blamed even for the idiotic behavior (gang activity, etc.) of other races and cultures. And yet, given the choice between the societies they have created (latin America,etc.) and the society Americans have created, people vote with their feet as to who gets the society building thing right and who gets it wrong.
The farmers did just fine before all of the illegal immigration as well. Before the late 80's the high-school kids were hired to do the work. Now high-school kids can't get a summer job in the orchards because there are too many illegals to do the work, not because they wouldn't do the work. As for the school issue, its not an immigration problem....its an illegal immigration problem. The Yakima school systems are in very poor shape because if this, and all kids are suffering. I don't mean to sound so negative, but the facts are the facts. I still like my hometown, but its not what it used to be. Mrhyak 15:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I am changing: "Dave Edler, Former Major League Baseball Player, former anchor of KNDO evening news,City of Yakima Mayor, Pastor" to "Dave Edler, Former Major League Baseball Player, City of Yakima Mayor, Pastor" because Dave Ettl is the former anchor of KNDO evening news. Common mistake among Yakimaniacs. We in Spokane understand..... -- 67.185.75.97 20:48, 7 February 2007
Sorry, but no one from Yakima or a true 'Yakimaniac' would confuse Dave Edler with Dave Ettl. Not disrespect to either; they've both earned their individuality and those in Yakima know the difference. TheeBurnz ( talk) 03:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed there isn't anything about North Yakima - you know, what is now Union Gap? I'm pretty sure North Yakima and current-day Yakima is one of the most famous aspects of the city - the fact that the whole city was moved from one location to the other, and the hotel actually stayed open the whole trip! When I have time, I'll find the specs and edit it myself, but I was quite surprised that wasn't even in the trivia! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.189.199.180 ( talk) 21:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC).
"North Yakima" is Yakima. What is now Union Gap was "Yakima." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.11.241 ( talk) 06:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
I've been watching the changes to this page for quite some time now, and something just doesn't sit right with me. I am not sure how to fix it, but I have a few ideas...
The overall tone of the article isn't consistent. It is often either very negative or excessively positive. I've especially noticed this in the Economy section. I'm the first to admit that Yakima has its share of economic and social problems, but the alternating edits by the "glass is half-empty" and "glass is half-full" contributors have turned it into a roller-coaster. It's almost starting to sound a bit like a debate between two people who disagree on how the economy should be handled.
Example (the negative): "In the last five years, three major department stores and an entire shopping mall have closed for business. While several theories to 'revitalize' the city's downtown have been put forth by civic leaders, none has proven effective."
Problem: The first statement is true (at least, it is until the events pass beyond the five-year-window of accuracy... might have already). The second statement is someone's negative opinion ("effective" is a subjective term in this case, and judging whether any scheme is or is not effective would depend on who you ask). For all we know, this contributor wouldn't consider any plan "effective" unless The Bon, Mervyns, Penneys and Nordstrom all came back to Downtown.
Example (the positive): "The early 2000s have seen the return to the downtown of the Sports Center Tavern, a local landmark, as well as the opening of The Hilton Garden Inn, The Speakeasy Bar, ... and The Barrel House. Developers are aiming for an early 2008 completion for condominiums in the Bon Marche building of the former Yakima Mall."
Problem: Reads like a promotion, not like an encyclopedia. The business names should probably be pulled, and the text rewritten to something more general like "In the early 2000s, Downtown Yakima showed some signs of returning life in the form of restaurants, hotels, pubs, and new housing." Being less specific also allows the article to be accurate for a longer period (if "The Lofts" is a bust and isn't finished, someone will have to edit it again). Oh, and "the return to the downtown of the Sports Center" is very awkwardly worded.
In view of that, I think the following ought to be considered: 1. Create a "Tourism" section and move everything related to it (like the trolleys) into that section. Write a paragraph or two in "Economy" on tourism's impact on it (if anyone's got figures for what wine tasting, outdoor recreation, the trolleys, etc contribute, that's where it should be). Conventions and their economic impact would be good subjects here, too. 2. Create a "Neighborhoods" section and add a subsection for Downtown. Describe the changes (rolling north from Yakima City, fires, booms, busts, the goal of transitioning from retail to urban neighborhood), why people go there. Other neighborhoods could be added as well, resulting in a more complete view of the city. 3. In "Economy", downtown could still be mentioned in the context of it's large employers, convention draw, etc. Maybe someone's got numbers as to how many people work there? 4. Get rid of the opinions, and clean up the dates (this "in the last five years" stuff has to go). 5. Create a "Social Issues" section (or some such thing) and move statements like the final paragraph of Economy (about illegal immigration) into it. The fact that the issue is debated in the press has nothing to do with the economy.
I've tried doing this myself, but ended throwing away the changes because it was too daunting a task. I figured changes as drastic as what I was attempting would end up getting undone by somebody. So I decided to share my plan with everyone, instead... Thoughts? -- 75.165.142.199 08:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
I am sad to see the section about that ridiculous sign has been removed. As a Yakima resident I found it to be hilarious, and also vindicating, as it established that no one in our city's local goverment (past or present) had a part in that sign being erected. -- 66.189.197.220 06:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
The article has West Valley and Terrace Heights listed as unincorporated suburbs, but in fact they are neighborhoods right in Yakima. There was actually a debate a couple years back where residents wanted to make West Valley its own town but the motion was rejected and it remained a part of Yakima Proper. Kristamaranatha ( talk) 14:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
further note: a person from Yakima is not a Yakimaniac, as said on pollitcally incorrect children's show iCarly, it is YAKIMANIAN. Just thought I might let everybody know.
This section is out of control —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.186.91.198 ( talk) 08:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Seems this issue came during a time when a local, highly publicized person was involved in controversial issues. Stopping/deleting this section indefinitely discredits local residents who should recognized. Please consider republishing much of the established history that was previously documented and not let a blot in time remove their place in history. TheeBurnz ( talk) 03:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
What does it mean to say that "Yakima Valley soil... is very similar to the soil conditions of France"? France has a lot of different soil types. Which type, specifically, does Yakima have? I don't mean to sound overly critical, but this is really vague and just sounds self- congratulatory. Mikemikemikea ( talk) 08:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
The information on the (old grave pit) lakes on the north side of Yakima is a bit in error, but more amusing is Wikipedia's refusal to accept an objective edit informing readers of the largest (old gravel pit) lake in Yakima (50 acres, 120 feet deep), LL Buchanan Lake, on the east side of Yakima, within the City limits. The lake has its own website (BuchananLake.com), and three floating islands that have become acknowledged as the most commonly mentioned visual image of Yakima. Now, just who deleted the flawlessly factual and objective edit if there is no editorial board? Wikipedia has a growing sector of detractors pointing out verifiable errors and omissions that Wikipedia refuses to correct. It will require a few more decades for Wikipedia to become reliable for useful information. I hit the "Save" button on this once, by it did not appear on Wikipedia. I will try again. This comment was written by Doug@DougBuchanan.com. You can ask him any questions, and he will respond with the most accurate answer his mind can devise.
why not add the lake in the context of the neighboring arboretum? Fimbriata ( talk) 22:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
The passage following passage was contradictory, implying that Fort Simcoe was established in "1856" as a "cause" rather than a result of the "Yakama Indian War of 1858":
"The arrival of settlers and their conflicts with the natives resulted in the Yakama Indian War of 1858. The U.S. Army established Fort Simcoe in 1856 near present-day White Swan as a response to the uprising."
I changed this name of the war to the "Yakima War", linking to an existing article here and at the same time doing away with the dating problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jah59 ( talk • contribs) 17:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I am going to attempt to clean up this article and would appreciate any feedback and collaboration.
Here are some the objectives, in no particular order:
As I plan to be bold, please post here if there are concerns. I'm specifically going to remove a fair amount of material lacking citations. MrX 18:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
I have made a number of changes and updated most of the demographics. I have collapsed the climate data weather box and plan to completely move the media listings to appropriate category pages where they belong.
I am using the Spokane, Washington article as a prototype for this article, as it has an 'A' quality rating. MrX 16:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Did not see mention of the Yakima Valley Community Band and their Concerts in the Parks summer concerts program that has been ongoing for years? Yakima's first communinty band was the City of Yakima Band created in 1917. City of Yakima Band became the Yakima Elks Band. It disbanded and the Yakima Community Band was formed and later renamed Yakima Valley Community Band to encompass the broader area since musicians came from many parts of the Valley and concerts had begun to be performed around the Yakima Valley. The community band in Yakima has been an important part in having a group where woodwind, brass and percussion musicians can play and perform together and in providing Yakima with live entertainment. The Yakima Valley Community Band has around sixty five members and performs two indoor concerts during the Winter and Spring season with a five week summer concert series called Concerts in the Parks held out at Randall Park. The band also travel for three summer concerts to other locations such as the City of Selah and the City of Toppenish. Historically the band has traveled to numerous cities around the valley and the state of Washington with two oversea tours. One to Switzerland in 1996 and one to the United Kingdom in 1999. Website is yakimacommunityband.org and the current Band Director is Roger Finch. Associate Band Director is Dan Waldbaum. I am throwing this out here having noticed no mention was made of the community band history and current status of a community band in Yakima. Not sure what or where to go with this other that to start by posting this note here and now. Maybe someone more in the know will come along and pick up this ball and run with and hopefully will get inserting into the Wikipedia info on Yakima. Yakima Valley Community Band member and Eb Clarinetist. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pearbaron ( talk • contribs) 01:35, October 20, 2014
the following section contains no references, and appears to be entirely trivia. a film or book that centers on yakima, and shows the culture (or lack thereof) would be an appropriate listing. i put it herre in case someone feels a listing is truly relevant, and can then add a source, NOT just proof that the city is in the media, but that its presence is discussed. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 17:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Yakima, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Yakima, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
What is the relevavance of listing the Target shooting in the history section? This happens every weekend in Yakima TheBigRedTank ( talk) 18:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The section on bodies of water briefly mentions, "A 10-mile (16 km) walking and cycling trail, a park, and a wildlife sanctuary are located at the river's edge." This walking path is actually a 20 mile system of parks and pathways along the Naches and Yakima river. The Greenway is a huge part of the community and parts of it are a reclaimed dump. [2] https://www.yakimagreenway.org/ Farrisj6 ( talk) 01:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)