This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
explanation follows in a timely manner 158.181.81.240 ( talk) 18:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
i am editing ww2 era articles." - Yes, and you're disrupting them as well. You need to revert less and engage more.
"the guy publishes his email and accepts corrections.
" - Have you even read the policy on
verifiability, specifically the section on
self-published sources?
"the site is used all over wikipedia.
" - that is a grandiose claim for a wiki with over 6.5 million articles. That the site "shipbuildinghistory.com" has been added to a few obsure articles on shipbuiding is hardly surprising. It also does not automatically make that site reliable, as required by policy.
"i think you are trying to recruit me as a pet to do useless tasks for you...
" - a
personal attack that is typical of you and beneath me.
"...and i will revert it and let arbitration decide.
" - have you even read the policy on
edit warring? Also, this is a content dispute, they are not decided on by the
Arbitration Committee. In a content dispute, you are expected to engage on the talk page and try to seek a consensus, and to leave the article at
WP:QUO, without making any further reverts. If consensus cannot be attained, then your next step is to go follow the
Dispute Resolution policy. I strongly encourage you to do just that, and in the meantime, you should self-revert your
last edit, and refrain from any further personal attacks and insults. -
wolf
22:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=YMS-1-class_minesweeper&oldid=1098650763
if someone wants to finish this 158.181.82.96 ( talk) 12:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
...why exactly is that not a source that is good enough to use to take the time and enter lists of boatbuilders that can then later at much greater convenience be corrected by a different person with better sources." - Again, that's not how it works. You don't deliberately add substandard content with the expectation that someone else will fix it for you. You need to properly source the content you add, when you add it, or don't add it at all.
if you want i can go through your edit history and axe all navsource.org references. do you use that site?" - that would be harassment and good way to find yourself getting blocked from editing. You need to stop with this hostile, belligerant attitude and constant attempts to turn discussion threads into battlegrounds. Keep to the subject at hand, not other articles, and focus on WP:EDITSNOTEDITORS. - wolf 13:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
you are trying to be helpful again? don't." - have you even tried to be mature and cooperative yet? Do.
everybody enters information into wikipedia with the expectation that it will be verified." - uh... what? No, only you do that.
telling a person that he is making hypocritical arguments is not harassment." - no, that is just as bad, if not worse.
if you want to read rules to people full time, while lacking a sense of subtlety in applying the rules, don't be surprised if you get insulted. you are engaging in a widespread low key cultural sickness." - Wow. Actually, you know what? Nevermind what I said... you just keep doing what you're doing! (iow, not WP:ROPES, just WP:ROPE...) Have a nice day - wolf 14:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
explanation follows in a timely manner 158.181.81.240 ( talk) 18:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
i am editing ww2 era articles." - Yes, and you're disrupting them as well. You need to revert less and engage more.
"the guy publishes his email and accepts corrections.
" - Have you even read the policy on
verifiability, specifically the section on
self-published sources?
"the site is used all over wikipedia.
" - that is a grandiose claim for a wiki with over 6.5 million articles. That the site "shipbuildinghistory.com" has been added to a few obsure articles on shipbuiding is hardly surprising. It also does not automatically make that site reliable, as required by policy.
"i think you are trying to recruit me as a pet to do useless tasks for you...
" - a
personal attack that is typical of you and beneath me.
"...and i will revert it and let arbitration decide.
" - have you even read the policy on
edit warring? Also, this is a content dispute, they are not decided on by the
Arbitration Committee. In a content dispute, you are expected to engage on the talk page and try to seek a consensus, and to leave the article at
WP:QUO, without making any further reverts. If consensus cannot be attained, then your next step is to go follow the
Dispute Resolution policy. I strongly encourage you to do just that, and in the meantime, you should self-revert your
last edit, and refrain from any further personal attacks and insults. -
wolf
22:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=YMS-1-class_minesweeper&oldid=1098650763
if someone wants to finish this 158.181.82.96 ( talk) 12:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
...why exactly is that not a source that is good enough to use to take the time and enter lists of boatbuilders that can then later at much greater convenience be corrected by a different person with better sources." - Again, that's not how it works. You don't deliberately add substandard content with the expectation that someone else will fix it for you. You need to properly source the content you add, when you add it, or don't add it at all.
if you want i can go through your edit history and axe all navsource.org references. do you use that site?" - that would be harassment and good way to find yourself getting blocked from editing. You need to stop with this hostile, belligerant attitude and constant attempts to turn discussion threads into battlegrounds. Keep to the subject at hand, not other articles, and focus on WP:EDITSNOTEDITORS. - wolf 13:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
you are trying to be helpful again? don't." - have you even tried to be mature and cooperative yet? Do.
everybody enters information into wikipedia with the expectation that it will be verified." - uh... what? No, only you do that.
telling a person that he is making hypocritical arguments is not harassment." - no, that is just as bad, if not worse.
if you want to read rules to people full time, while lacking a sense of subtlety in applying the rules, don't be surprised if you get insulted. you are engaging in a widespread low key cultural sickness." - Wow. Actually, you know what? Nevermind what I said... you just keep doing what you're doing! (iow, not WP:ROPES, just WP:ROPE...) Have a nice day - wolf 14:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)