The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
A fact from Xinuos appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 January 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On the Xinuos website, I see "SCO OpenServer 5" and "Xinuos OpenServer 5" and also "OpenServer 5 Definitive". The naming appears very inconsistent. I have chosen the format "OpenServer 5 Definitive" because then it avoids the SCO/Xinuos matter, and it is clear that Xinuos only sells the "definitive" versions of these older operating systems. So basically, I think we should avoid using "SCO" and "Xinuos" in the product names unless necessary because in some cases it is ambiguous. By avoiding SCO/Xinuos in product names, we can be sure that the article is consistent and less confusing for readers. Huihermit ( talk) 09:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
A fact from Xinuos appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 January 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On the Xinuos website, I see "SCO OpenServer 5" and "Xinuos OpenServer 5" and also "OpenServer 5 Definitive". The naming appears very inconsistent. I have chosen the format "OpenServer 5 Definitive" because then it avoids the SCO/Xinuos matter, and it is clear that Xinuos only sells the "definitive" versions of these older operating systems. So basically, I think we should avoid using "SCO" and "Xinuos" in the product names unless necessary because in some cases it is ambiguous. By avoiding SCO/Xinuos in product names, we can be sure that the article is consistent and less confusing for readers. Huihermit ( talk) 09:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)