| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Xelia Mendes-Jones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
If I were Mendes-Jones I’d be greatly appreciative of the work somebody is doing to boost her work’s online visibility, but they seem to be pushing it a bit. Can you really be “best known for” appearances in both a current TV series (a prominent role in Fallout) and a film (Havoc) that hasn’t been released yet? (Can you be “known” at all for nobody has seen for that matter?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.111.150 ( talk) 07:04, May 28, 2024 (UTC)
I've noticed repeated inconsistent vandalism regarding his pronouns, apparently performed without basic find/replace tools. Silly culture wars aside it's distracting and adds no value. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Protection_policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:100:73F0:8F70:B35E:BF56:7F3F ( talk) 23:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's especially egregious to go and vandalize the pronouns in a direct quote. I added a request, hopefully at least for a temporary lock
Cursuviam (
talk) 23:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have put under indefinite extended-confirmed protection, to be logged at CTOPS, and RevDel'ed the offending edits going back a month or so. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Xelia Mendes-Jones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
If I were Mendes-Jones I’d be greatly appreciative of the work somebody is doing to boost her work’s online visibility, but they seem to be pushing it a bit. Can you really be “best known for” appearances in both a current TV series (a prominent role in Fallout) and a film (Havoc) that hasn’t been released yet? (Can you be “known” at all for nobody has seen for that matter?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.111.150 ( talk) 07:04, May 28, 2024 (UTC)
I've noticed repeated inconsistent vandalism regarding his pronouns, apparently performed without basic find/replace tools. Silly culture wars aside it's distracting and adds no value. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Protection_policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:283:100:73F0:8F70:B35E:BF56:7F3F ( talk) 23:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's especially egregious to go and vandalize the pronouns in a direct quote. I added a request, hopefully at least for a temporary lock
Cursuviam (
talk) 23:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have put under indefinite extended-confirmed protection, to be logged at CTOPS, and RevDel'ed the offending edits going back a month or so. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)