 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The link for radeox is bad: http://www.radeox.org/ so, what's the status of xwiki?
- It's vital as of 2012-01, v 3.3. I removed the old tag, recusing myself as I use this package in paid work. Nothing wrong factually but the article reads like an advert and should have different more neutral tone/perspective, independent reviews, etc. Removed the primary source tag I placed however, in favor of a section linking comparison with competing packages. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The link for radeox is bad: http://www.radeox.org/ so, what's the status of xwiki?
- It's vital as of 2012-01, v 3.3. I removed the old tag, recusing myself as I use this package in paid work. Nothing wrong factually but the article reads like an advert and should have different more neutral tone/perspective, independent reviews, etc. Removed the primary source tag I placed however, in favor of a section linking comparison with competing packages. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)