![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I think we need such a section. (By the way, are there any official information about the future of XSL FO? Thanx!) -- LinuxEdit0r ( talk) 05:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Can we create a list of XSL-FO elements and attributes on Wikipedia (such as at XSF-FO/1.0/Element_Reference or something similar), with syntax, explaination, examples, problems, tips & compatibility? I'd be willing to start compiling this, but I do not know if that would be an incorrect use of Wikipedia. I think it would be good to have a list at an easiy-accessible place like this, with users experiences of problems as well. -- MBread 19:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm about to remove the sentence
since it seems self-evident that if one wants to print something then one needn't test multiple processors, except to the extent that that doing so is involved in selecting an FO processor that fulfills one's needs.
I will replace it with a sentence saying that distributing the final pdf rather than the formatting language input (whether HTML/CSS or XSL-FO) means on the one hand that users aren't affected by differences among formatting language interpreters, while on the other hand means that the document cannot easily adapt to different users' needs (different page size or preferred font size, tailoring for on-screen versus on-paper versus audio presentation). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjrm ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
The existing initial paragraph:
has the following issues:
For the moment, I'll simply remove these two fragments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjrm ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
What about mentioning something about future? Seems like there is a 2.0 draft ready since 2008???-- Kozuch ( talk) 08:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I think we need such a section. (By the way, are there any official information about the future of XSL FO? Thanx!) -- LinuxEdit0r ( talk) 05:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Can we create a list of XSL-FO elements and attributes on Wikipedia (such as at XSF-FO/1.0/Element_Reference or something similar), with syntax, explaination, examples, problems, tips & compatibility? I'd be willing to start compiling this, but I do not know if that would be an incorrect use of Wikipedia. I think it would be good to have a list at an easiy-accessible place like this, with users experiences of problems as well. -- MBread 19:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm about to remove the sentence
since it seems self-evident that if one wants to print something then one needn't test multiple processors, except to the extent that that doing so is involved in selecting an FO processor that fulfills one's needs.
I will replace it with a sentence saying that distributing the final pdf rather than the formatting language input (whether HTML/CSS or XSL-FO) means on the one hand that users aren't affected by differences among formatting language interpreters, while on the other hand means that the document cannot easily adapt to different users' needs (different page size or preferred font size, tailoring for on-screen versus on-paper versus audio presentation). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjrm ( talk • contribs) 08:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
The existing initial paragraph:
has the following issues:
For the moment, I'll simply remove these two fragments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjrm ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
What about mentioning something about future? Seems like there is a 2.0 draft ready since 2008???-- Kozuch ( talk) 08:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)