![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please explain how the GPL is "incompatible with the MPEG-LA patent licenses in jurisdictions that recognize software patents"? If there is an incompatibility (what is that incompatibility?), shouldn't it be referenced on the GPL page? -- MyOwnLittlWorld 02:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
No...
x264 is a free software library for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format.
OR
x264 is a free software library for DEcoding H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 157.193.48.16 ( talk) 07:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Hmph, AFAIK x264 can't really decode anything, it's just an encoder. SeriousWorm 18:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the capabilities section of the article is very confusing and needs a redesign. I created one here using a table. Please tell me what you think about it so I can improve it and include it in the article. M@RIX 19:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Other than that, its great. Fix those and be bold and add it to the article. — Dark•Shikari [T] 03:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be enough to just mention what Profile features it supports? and then append any extra features onto that...also listing all the CLI options is overkill (see WP:NOTMANUAL) - Xedaf ( talk) 21:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm having a hard time seeing why it was disputed. I only see facts... there isn't even anything that could be misconstrued as opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.83.201 ( talk) 20:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I removed the tag
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (September 2009) |
because I thought it wasn't needed any more. If anyone thinks it's still needed, feel free to put it back. Thebombzen ( talk) 16:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the "X" in the " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X264" URL to be capitalized, since the name of the software is "x264". I would correct it myself, but am not sure how; and I thought that I might end up feeling the wrath of the Wikipedia editors if I did. Damienivan ( talk) 20:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Please expand the history section: When was the first release? When did it start supporting the High Profiles? Things like that would be an interesting read.-- 146.52.211.177 ( talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on X264. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please explain how the GPL is "incompatible with the MPEG-LA patent licenses in jurisdictions that recognize software patents"? If there is an incompatibility (what is that incompatibility?), shouldn't it be referenced on the GPL page? -- MyOwnLittlWorld 02:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
No...
x264 is a free software library for encoding video streams into the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC format.
OR
x264 is a free software library for DEcoding H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video streams —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 157.193.48.16 ( talk) 07:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Hmph, AFAIK x264 can't really decode anything, it's just an encoder. SeriousWorm 18:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the capabilities section of the article is very confusing and needs a redesign. I created one here using a table. Please tell me what you think about it so I can improve it and include it in the article. M@RIX 19:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Other than that, its great. Fix those and be bold and add it to the article. — Dark•Shikari [T] 03:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be enough to just mention what Profile features it supports? and then append any extra features onto that...also listing all the CLI options is overkill (see WP:NOTMANUAL) - Xedaf ( talk) 21:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm having a hard time seeing why it was disputed. I only see facts... there isn't even anything that could be misconstrued as opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.83.201 ( talk) 20:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I removed the tag
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (September 2009) |
because I thought it wasn't needed any more. If anyone thinks it's still needed, feel free to put it back. Thebombzen ( talk) 16:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the "X" in the " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X264" URL to be capitalized, since the name of the software is "x264". I would correct it myself, but am not sure how; and I thought that I might end up feeling the wrath of the Wikipedia editors if I did. Damienivan ( talk) 20:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Please expand the history section: When was the first release? When did it start supporting the High Profiles? Things like that would be an interesting read.-- 146.52.211.177 ( talk) 16:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on X264. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)