GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk) 21:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I always enjoy reading your articles. Here goes-
I've rephrased in a few places (see this) so feel free to revert if I've missed something key. I don't know if you have access to JSTOR (I can send you articles if need be), but I came across this-
English Coins quick view R. H. Dolley The British Museum Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Jun., 1953), pp. 54-55
Which may have something to add. I also found reference to "the life by Stubbs in the Dictionary of Christian Biography, iv. 1195-7" Which would be worth looking at. I'm not sure if the Dictionary of Christian Biography is available online. J Milburn ( talk) 21:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
1. - I've got a death date, which should satisfy the requirement here. 2. Fixed. 3. I've tried to clarify this a bit more 4. I think the "Is believed" covers the probablity of this well enough. 5. Added that the king supported the lay control of monasteries. 6. Uh.... the king got pissed that the archbishop was opposing him and deposed the archbishop? I'm not sure what is unclear to you so I have no idea how to fix it. 7. Yes, it's repetition, but ... is there a better way to phrase this that doesn't lose the meaning? Sometimes we worship at the altar of "avoid repetition" so much that we lose important context. 8. Suggestions for a better phrasing though? 9. Again, Im not sure what's confusing you here... The kings and Wulfred had a dispute over these monasteries....that's the dispute mentioned in the previous sentence. 10. Nope, not a typo. Werhard got the lands, but after Werhard's death the lands were supposed to go to Canterbury.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk) 21:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
I always enjoy reading your articles. Here goes-
I've rephrased in a few places (see this) so feel free to revert if I've missed something key. I don't know if you have access to JSTOR (I can send you articles if need be), but I came across this-
English Coins quick view R. H. Dolley The British Museum Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Jun., 1953), pp. 54-55
Which may have something to add. I also found reference to "the life by Stubbs in the Dictionary of Christian Biography, iv. 1195-7" Which would be worth looking at. I'm not sure if the Dictionary of Christian Biography is available online. J Milburn ( talk) 21:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
1. - I've got a death date, which should satisfy the requirement here. 2. Fixed. 3. I've tried to clarify this a bit more 4. I think the "Is believed" covers the probablity of this well enough. 5. Added that the king supported the lay control of monasteries. 6. Uh.... the king got pissed that the archbishop was opposing him and deposed the archbishop? I'm not sure what is unclear to you so I have no idea how to fix it. 7. Yes, it's repetition, but ... is there a better way to phrase this that doesn't lose the meaning? Sometimes we worship at the altar of "avoid repetition" so much that we lose important context. 8. Suggestions for a better phrasing though? 9. Again, Im not sure what's confusing you here... The kings and Wulfred had a dispute over these monasteries....that's the dispute mentioned in the previous sentence. 10. Nope, not a typo. Werhard got the lands, but after Werhard's death the lands were supposed to go to Canterbury.