This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wrexham A.F.C. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Have removed Simon Lenard-Jones from the squad, as a Wrexham fan I've never heard of him and can't find any other evidence of him on the net - please re-add with some evidence if anyone knows who he is. Jaded1 12:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
THIS MUST BE THE MOST BIASED AND OPIONATED ARTICLE ON WIKI!!" WREXHAM HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION AS GIANT KILLERS". yEAH, EVERYWHERE I GO AROUND THE WORLD ALL PEOPLE ASK IS ABOUT WREXHAM!!! Please someone sort this page out, its about a tiny, unimportant little none league team, not manhester united. FFS!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.249.185 ( talk) 09:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 05:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
As found in the Companies House website and mentioned in the article itself:
Wrexham Football Club (2006) Ltd is the name of the 'phoenix' company that took over the assets of the old Wrexham Association Football Club Limited so technically the club is no longer known as Wrexham AFC
Should this article be moved to Wrexham FC? Marbles 21:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
If you look at the club badge on the kit the A has been removed!
Want to put it back now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.171.50 ( talk • contribs)
Hmm, and the official website now calls the team Wrexham FC. Born Acorn 17:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
It is Wrexham FC i would leave it how it is now please. Hello wrexham peeps by the way. Delighted eyes 04:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Contemporary Wrexham Advertiser articles reports foundation of the club as 1864. Reports of the first match as taking place on 22nd October of that year (Wrexham advertiser 8/10/1864, 21/10/1864, 29/10/1864). My (referenced) edits were reverted but see the Trust AGM documents for further evidence of continuity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.92.107 ( talk) 16:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Since 2012 it has been claimed that Wrexham were the 3rd oldest professional association football club behind Notts County and Stoke City, being formed in 1864. In 2019 upon the relegation of Notts County; Notts Forest(1865) challenged Stoke City as the oldest club in the EFL and succeeded when it was evidenced that Stoke were in fact formed in 1868. This was acknowledged by the FA but this doesn't mean to any form of logic that you can just substitute Notts Forrest as the second oldest pro club when it was formed a year LATER than Wrexham.
If Wrexham wish to keep acknowledging Stoke's claim that's their prerogative perhaps but under no circumstances are Nottingham Forest older than Wrexham! And having this format list an 1865 club as older than an 1864 club is evidence of how poor a source it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:A080:4E01:AC4D:DF39:C072:3472 ( talk) 17:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Image:Wrexham badge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 13:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I've just taken a look at this page for the first time in many months, and have to say that I am absolutely horrified with the absolute shambles this article has become. It has obviously become a plaything for a few anonymous editors who have been putting any old rubbish in here, and the continual edits and reverts have left crap all over the place - "Grove Park School for disabled children" in the early history of the club??? I am immediately semi-protecting this article to keep the vandals out - if you want to edit it, get yourself a registered account and wait 4 days. I'm also going to revert the article to the 12th October version which at least seems to be relatively problem-free - sorry if some genuine edits get reverted, but good-faith editors can always put those back. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 23:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to propose that the inclusion criteria be: Played a substantial number of games for Wrexham OR attained international caps. Pwimageglow ( talk) 18:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody cite a reliable source on 007 actor Daniel Craig's support for Wrexham AFC? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.5.250.131 ( talk) 12:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
No he was born in Chester and supports Liverpool. He grew up in Holylake and went to a few Chesse city games as a kid. Keegan10 ( talk) 18:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
In the history section (1872 - 1905) a reference is being made to the Football Combination league, which Wrexham joined in 1890. However, the wikilink points to an article about a league that wasn't started until 1915 and says that it shouldn't be confused with something else.
Maybe I'm just a stupid dutchman who knows nothing about English/Welsh football, but shouldn't the link point to The_Combination rather than Football_Combination? Skysmurf ( talk) 21:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I think it's too long for the main page and a new page would be suitable - "History of Wrexham AFC" - for example. Pretty much every club has an additional page for their history as there's a lot of text.
Would anyone be able to move the history to a new page and copy the text/pictures/references over? I would be happy to then update the new page as there's quite a bit missing. For example, we have more text on the current season then we do for 1960-70!
AndrewRichardJones ( talk) 19:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
The history is VERY confusing. Where do all the moves fit into the English system?
/info/en/?search=English_football_league_system
Of course, that is pretty confusing itself.
74.127.200.37 (
talk)
18:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrexham has a fierce rivalry with Chester,[64][65] the clubs are just 12 miles apart, but are English and Welsh respectively
This is the text in the article but it is not correct, the clubs are surely 'Welsh and English respectively' and not the other way round ????/ — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.158.205.231 (
talk)
12:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrexham F.C. → Wrexham A.F.C. – Club renamed, as per infobox on the page itself – Owain ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Club renamed, as per infobox on the page itself – Owain ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Wrexham A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wrexham A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The article claims that Wrexham is the 3rd oldest football club in the world but this is objectively wrong.
Sheffield Football Club was founded in 1857. Melbourne Football Club was founded in 1859 and Geelong Football Club was founded later that same year. All those 3 football clubs still exist.
Wrexham was founded in 1864. Therefore, Wrexham can't be the 3rd oldest football club in the world. However, Melbourne and Geelong play Aussie Rules.
Does the article mean that Wrexham is the 3rd oldest soccer club in the world? If so, then this should be clarified in the article.
Wales is the third oldest professional team. WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 00:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Should Welcome to Wrekham have it own page. 92.236.253.249 ( talk) 14:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I don’t know if this is just quibbling, but I’m not sure if “RR McReynolds Company, LLC” should be listed as the owners as it’s not a registered company in the UK (no entry on Companies House). It was in fact registered in Delaware in October 2020 [1] and has a branch registered in California in September 2021 [2]. Thoughts? — Arwel Parry (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Think an SVG version of the club logo should be added if possible. Joseph1891 ( talk) 15:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
I can get .SVG images it's just that it says 1973 instead of 1964 WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 20:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
It makes it look atleast visible now nothing really changed WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 15:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
No point of changing the logo if it’s not replaced with an SVG version. Don’t really see a difference from the new one to what it look liked before? Joseph1891 ( talk) 10:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Ah I see, sorry about that Joseph1891 ( talk) 22:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
In the left, it says that at some time in the past the club was "relegated." This may be a term of art in the UK to mean "reduced to some understood lower status," but as a U.S. reader, I'm left saying "relegated to WHAT?" Edison ( talk) 13:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
With this article at over 160kB, I believe this article would qualify for WP:SIZESPLIT as it seems quite bloated currently. I was considering splitting sections from this article such as: Player of the Year, Young Player of the Year, Steve Edwards Goal of the Season Award, Top scorers and PFA Team of the Year onto a new page - List of Wrexham A.F.C. records and statistics. I would also add honours and European records etc in line with other existing pages such as: List of Port Vale F.C. records and statistics. What are people's thoughts on this? Michaeldble ( talk) 15:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
In the part of the article documenting the goings-on in the early years of this century, there’s a bit: “Had the club still been in Administration by 3 June (2007) then Wrexham would have automatically been expelled from the League because of their financial situation. Wrexham Football Club (2006) Ltd is the name of the "phoenix" company that took over the assets of the old Wrexham Association Football Club Limited – technically, the club is no longer known as Wrexham Association Football Club due to the takeover of the club by Neville Dickens and Geoff Moss and their associates; this is reflected on new merchandise, although most fans will still refer to it as "Wrexham AFC".” This is not actually a full description of what happened, but the tangled web of administration and suchlike is complex, as I discovered while poking around on Companies House:
— Arwel Parry (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Stockport and Wrexham were auto-promoted hours ago and their article references that. So should this. https://theathletic.com/5412493/2024/04/13/wrexham-promoted-league-one/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1F:8702:F501:FC2B:1B88:346A:1538 ( talk) 20:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi I created a Malayalam translation of this page. But the automatic translation of the name 'Wrexham' wasn't right in Malayalam, so I edited it. But I think because of that, it didn't get linked to the original article.
Forgetting I did the same exercise six months ago, I did it again (Because when I looked for the malayalam version of the page, I couldn't find one, sorry.) 
But what I did is, I made both pages exactly the same.
So, if anyone could, please choose one page, link it to the original and delete the other one.
Linking both here (They are exactly the same):
റെക്സം എ.എഫ്.സി - വിക്കിപീഡിയ (wikipedia.org)
റെക്സം എ. എഫ്. സി. - വിക്കിപീഡിയ (wikipedia.org) Libinthathappilly ( talk) 11:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
ml
).This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wrexham A.F.C. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Have removed Simon Lenard-Jones from the squad, as a Wrexham fan I've never heard of him and can't find any other evidence of him on the net - please re-add with some evidence if anyone knows who he is. Jaded1 12:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
THIS MUST BE THE MOST BIASED AND OPIONATED ARTICLE ON WIKI!!" WREXHAM HAVE AN INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION AS GIANT KILLERS". yEAH, EVERYWHERE I GO AROUND THE WORLD ALL PEOPLE ASK IS ABOUT WREXHAM!!! Please someone sort this page out, its about a tiny, unimportant little none league team, not manhester united. FFS!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.249.185 ( talk) 09:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 05:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
As found in the Companies House website and mentioned in the article itself:
Wrexham Football Club (2006) Ltd is the name of the 'phoenix' company that took over the assets of the old Wrexham Association Football Club Limited so technically the club is no longer known as Wrexham AFC
Should this article be moved to Wrexham FC? Marbles 21:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
If you look at the club badge on the kit the A has been removed!
Want to put it back now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.171.50 ( talk • contribs)
Hmm, and the official website now calls the team Wrexham FC. Born Acorn 17:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
It is Wrexham FC i would leave it how it is now please. Hello wrexham peeps by the way. Delighted eyes 04:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Contemporary Wrexham Advertiser articles reports foundation of the club as 1864. Reports of the first match as taking place on 22nd October of that year (Wrexham advertiser 8/10/1864, 21/10/1864, 29/10/1864). My (referenced) edits were reverted but see the Trust AGM documents for further evidence of continuity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.92.107 ( talk) 16:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Since 2012 it has been claimed that Wrexham were the 3rd oldest professional association football club behind Notts County and Stoke City, being formed in 1864. In 2019 upon the relegation of Notts County; Notts Forest(1865) challenged Stoke City as the oldest club in the EFL and succeeded when it was evidenced that Stoke were in fact formed in 1868. This was acknowledged by the FA but this doesn't mean to any form of logic that you can just substitute Notts Forrest as the second oldest pro club when it was formed a year LATER than Wrexham.
If Wrexham wish to keep acknowledging Stoke's claim that's their prerogative perhaps but under no circumstances are Nottingham Forest older than Wrexham! And having this format list an 1865 club as older than an 1864 club is evidence of how poor a source it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:A080:4E01:AC4D:DF39:C072:3472 ( talk) 17:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Image:Wrexham badge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 13:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I've just taken a look at this page for the first time in many months, and have to say that I am absolutely horrified with the absolute shambles this article has become. It has obviously become a plaything for a few anonymous editors who have been putting any old rubbish in here, and the continual edits and reverts have left crap all over the place - "Grove Park School for disabled children" in the early history of the club??? I am immediately semi-protecting this article to keep the vandals out - if you want to edit it, get yourself a registered account and wait 4 days. I'm also going to revert the article to the 12th October version which at least seems to be relatively problem-free - sorry if some genuine edits get reverted, but good-faith editors can always put those back. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 23:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to propose that the inclusion criteria be: Played a substantial number of games for Wrexham OR attained international caps. Pwimageglow ( talk) 18:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody cite a reliable source on 007 actor Daniel Craig's support for Wrexham AFC? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.5.250.131 ( talk) 12:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
No he was born in Chester and supports Liverpool. He grew up in Holylake and went to a few Chesse city games as a kid. Keegan10 ( talk) 18:55, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
In the history section (1872 - 1905) a reference is being made to the Football Combination league, which Wrexham joined in 1890. However, the wikilink points to an article about a league that wasn't started until 1915 and says that it shouldn't be confused with something else.
Maybe I'm just a stupid dutchman who knows nothing about English/Welsh football, but shouldn't the link point to The_Combination rather than Football_Combination? Skysmurf ( talk) 21:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I think it's too long for the main page and a new page would be suitable - "History of Wrexham AFC" - for example. Pretty much every club has an additional page for their history as there's a lot of text.
Would anyone be able to move the history to a new page and copy the text/pictures/references over? I would be happy to then update the new page as there's quite a bit missing. For example, we have more text on the current season then we do for 1960-70!
AndrewRichardJones ( talk) 19:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
The history is VERY confusing. Where do all the moves fit into the English system?
/info/en/?search=English_football_league_system
Of course, that is pretty confusing itself.
74.127.200.37 (
talk)
18:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrexham has a fierce rivalry with Chester,[64][65] the clubs are just 12 miles apart, but are English and Welsh respectively
This is the text in the article but it is not correct, the clubs are surely 'Welsh and English respectively' and not the other way round ????/ — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
217.158.205.231 (
talk)
12:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by a page mover). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrexham F.C. → Wrexham A.F.C. – Club renamed, as per infobox on the page itself – Owain ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Club renamed, as per infobox on the page itself – Owain ( talk) 20:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Wrexham A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Wrexham A.F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The article claims that Wrexham is the 3rd oldest football club in the world but this is objectively wrong.
Sheffield Football Club was founded in 1857. Melbourne Football Club was founded in 1859 and Geelong Football Club was founded later that same year. All those 3 football clubs still exist.
Wrexham was founded in 1864. Therefore, Wrexham can't be the 3rd oldest football club in the world. However, Melbourne and Geelong play Aussie Rules.
Does the article mean that Wrexham is the 3rd oldest soccer club in the world? If so, then this should be clarified in the article.
Wales is the third oldest professional team. WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 00:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Should Welcome to Wrekham have it own page. 92.236.253.249 ( talk) 14:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I don’t know if this is just quibbling, but I’m not sure if “RR McReynolds Company, LLC” should be listed as the owners as it’s not a registered company in the UK (no entry on Companies House). It was in fact registered in Delaware in October 2020 [1] and has a branch registered in California in September 2021 [2]. Thoughts? — Arwel Parry (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Think an SVG version of the club logo should be added if possible. Joseph1891 ( talk) 15:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
I can get .SVG images it's just that it says 1973 instead of 1964 WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 20:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
It makes it look atleast visible now nothing really changed WelshOfWallStreet ( talk) 15:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
No point of changing the logo if it’s not replaced with an SVG version. Don’t really see a difference from the new one to what it look liked before? Joseph1891 ( talk) 10:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Ah I see, sorry about that Joseph1891 ( talk) 22:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
In the left, it says that at some time in the past the club was "relegated." This may be a term of art in the UK to mean "reduced to some understood lower status," but as a U.S. reader, I'm left saying "relegated to WHAT?" Edison ( talk) 13:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
With this article at over 160kB, I believe this article would qualify for WP:SIZESPLIT as it seems quite bloated currently. I was considering splitting sections from this article such as: Player of the Year, Young Player of the Year, Steve Edwards Goal of the Season Award, Top scorers and PFA Team of the Year onto a new page - List of Wrexham A.F.C. records and statistics. I would also add honours and European records etc in line with other existing pages such as: List of Port Vale F.C. records and statistics. What are people's thoughts on this? Michaeldble ( talk) 15:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
In the part of the article documenting the goings-on in the early years of this century, there’s a bit: “Had the club still been in Administration by 3 June (2007) then Wrexham would have automatically been expelled from the League because of their financial situation. Wrexham Football Club (2006) Ltd is the name of the "phoenix" company that took over the assets of the old Wrexham Association Football Club Limited – technically, the club is no longer known as Wrexham Association Football Club due to the takeover of the club by Neville Dickens and Geoff Moss and their associates; this is reflected on new merchandise, although most fans will still refer to it as "Wrexham AFC".” This is not actually a full description of what happened, but the tangled web of administration and suchlike is complex, as I discovered while poking around on Companies House:
— Arwel Parry (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Stockport and Wrexham were auto-promoted hours ago and their article references that. So should this. https://theathletic.com/5412493/2024/04/13/wrexham-promoted-league-one/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1F:8702:F501:FC2B:1B88:346A:1538 ( talk) 20:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi I created a Malayalam translation of this page. But the automatic translation of the name 'Wrexham' wasn't right in Malayalam, so I edited it. But I think because of that, it didn't get linked to the original article.
Forgetting I did the same exercise six months ago, I did it again (Because when I looked for the malayalam version of the page, I couldn't find one, sorry.) 
But what I did is, I made both pages exactly the same.
So, if anyone could, please choose one page, link it to the original and delete the other one.
Linking both here (They are exactly the same):
റെക്സം എ.എഫ്.സി - വിക്കിപീഡിയ (wikipedia.org)
റെക്സം എ. എഫ്. സി. - വിക്കിപീഡിയ (wikipedia.org) Libinthathappilly ( talk) 11:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
ml
).