![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I think that article should remove that HBK or JBL will go to WM to challenge Undetaker, i'm sure they'll ask way before hand, and there'll be build up.
Another guy to challenge Undertaker for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.139.215 ( talk) 08:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think there should be anything about an Undertaker match until it is officially announced that he will even have a match and who the opponent will be. That would follow the protocol that applies to everything else on the wrestling articles. Wwehurricane1 ( talk) 23:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Well it's wrong because Kozlov will then challenge the winner of that match, so the article is wrong. They won't be going to Wrestlemania to challenge Taker, it will be before hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.1.87 ( talk • contribs)
Kozlov did challenge Undertaker, as the winner of tonights Raw will meet Kozlov next week on Raw.-- Mrrko ( talk) 03:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Gerweck.net has it at the following link. [1] Steveweiser ( talk) 22:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
the poster sometimes (not always, infact not even a majority of the time) shows the superstars competeing in the matches/main events. so could this be the superstars in the main events, tag matches and Money in the bank matches? Markgavin19 ( talk) 17:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
See here Super Silver 901 21:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you guys ever stop to think they are just going to call it different things but it always going to be WrestleMania 25 yes the tag line is WrestleMania 25 sliver but that not the name of the PPV
Will it be Jeff Hardy vs. Matt Hardy after Matt cost Jeff the WWE Championship. On Smackdown 4/3/09 they both have a Money in the Bank qualifing match but they both lose, on Smackdown the 13/3/09 Jeff takes Matt out, possibly leading to a Jeff vs. Matt at Wrestlemania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.174.121 ( talk) 19:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I was right Jim Ross and Tazz said breaking news Jeff vs. Matt at Wrestlemania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.174.121 ( talk) 23:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Jericho made a chalenge to Micky Rourke for a match at Wrestlemania, I think it should be noted in the Article. Alten hofen 03:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Wow, these guys are going far to make this crap look real... Like come on, Larry king???
03:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Since they started a rivalry should it be included? Boca91 ( talk)
there shouldnt be 8 contestants already figured out for the match, because jeff hardy lost out last year, plus due to recent injuries and high profile talent they might knock it back down to 6, or who knows how many and didnt discuss this on raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.120.170.5 ( talk) 14:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Just because it aired in India I don't think it should be added (yet)-- Falegas ( talk) 18:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion, Wrestlemania: 25th Anniversary is much more sutable, plus it fits it well. User: MK God —Preceding undated comment was added on 18:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC).
Not sourced, not confirmed, but Orton will be in (one of) the main event(s). He won the Rumble, and is offially in the main event. And don't try to prove me wrong, becasue; like in the discussion about money in the bank, it is most likely going to happen, but may change.
Also, In my opinion, it's gonna be DX vs rated RKO, with Shawn and HHH winning the World hevyweight championship, and WWE championship respectively, then the two of them and the undertaker fighting for the undisputed championship... Alten hofen 03:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Well if you think about that, he was in Smackdown's main event. So he probably is taking that into consideration.-- Will C 05:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put Orton in the article since he will be facing a champion a Wrestlemaina XXV and put Randy Orton vs. TBA? ThePe epShow 02:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Why is his break streak match added if it hasen't been officially anounced yet? Please remove please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falegas ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
It's not on the match list yet though.-- Falegas ( talk) 15:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
It's Michaels That Takers Facing. -- KingRaven44 ( talk) 7:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't there a table last year for the Money in the Bank qualifying matches or was I hallucinating? If so, should we add it? Super Silver 901 23:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
He isn't in the match - he's facing Santino Marella tonight-- Falegas ( talk) 13:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I've made the changes to the match. Hopefully after tonight's show, we can confirm the next participant. Scca8704 ( talk) 16:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I will say that it doesn't help a whole lot to have this article protected, because I had to correct the page because someone decided to jump the gun after the Raw/ECW show in Boston. Need I have to say this again, like others have said before. If you watch the program on TV (Raw, SmackDown, ECW, etc.)in the U.S. and can verify the results on WWE.com or any other legitimate source for any other wrestling promotion, then and only then can we add it to the page. Scca8704 ( talk) 06:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Well It Was Kinda Obvious That Henry Would Win :P. KingRaven44 ( talk) 07:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Why is it that some guys have their real names next to their ringnames, and some don't? It would make sense for them all to have their real names in parentheses next to their ring names with the exception, of course, being for those who use their real name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.68.193.3 ( talk) 15:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
It's not listed under matches on wwe.com. And Vickie only announced that Big Show is the no. 1 contender. Could still be Edge vs. Show vs. Cena. Nithas ( talk) 15:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Nithas whatever your smoking stop what Vickie said basic was Big show was Number one contender for edge title at WM25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.110.223 ( talk) 23:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Falegas, you're really annoying me now TBH. Why can't you just read what i've been saying. The match was never announced on RAW, and when i wrote the first post, the match was not listed on wwe.com Nithas ( talk) 17:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Big Show was on VH1's top twenty countdown this week, and during an interview he said that the main event will be Edge VS Show VS Cena. Here's a (bad quality) link to the interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyjBTmpTmSs. Beyonce's "Single Ladies" is number 17 this week, so it is recent. Any comments?
Cc12321 (
talk)
13:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
"although, it is only the 24th anniversary. WrestleMania 2 was the first anniversary, and as a result of the continuous chronology, WrestleMania XXV is the 24th anniversary, not the 25th as WWE promotes." There no fact to back up these clam and has been proven wrong by all wrestling websites [[User:Supermike|Supermike] ( talk) 1 —Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC).
It common sense that Its Wrestlemania 25 not 24 just ask a 5 year old they will know and help you Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
What are you arguing about? Quite frankly, there's no reason to argue, it's WWE's fault. So who's going to tell them. Just leave it-- Falegas ( talk) 19:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I heard on www.wrestlezone that there has been a confirmed 25 Diva Battle Roayl. It reads "WWE will be holding a 25-Diva Battle Royal at WrestleMania 25 next month. They are currently contacting past women to be involved with the match, tying in with the 25th anniversary theme of the event" I dont know if this is true also on former wwe diva's facebook Tammy Stych it says "is getting ready to kick some DIVA ASS at Wrestlemania". I dont know if we should add it. Also i dont know how to sign stuff so i am just writing my username chrispowellathome. Sorry ppl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrispowellathome ( talk • contribs) 11:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Powell sign ur posts by 4 ~ Adster 95 16:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Really I find it it a more reliable source then Wikipedia which keeps calling WM25 WM24 Infact I thinks you should Apologys to them for your slander —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Right Seriously I've had enough WM 25 is the 24th Aniversary of Wrestlemania because Wrestlemania 2 was the first anniversary of Wreslemania becuase the day you get married isn't your 1st anniversary, its a year after you get married! Adster 95 09:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Vickie Guerrero just announced on RAW that this match will take place to crown the 1st Miss WrestleMania! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.109.126 ( talk) 02:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
since this is the 24 WM why not just put the matchs from last year on here Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Wrong Its the 25 anniversary just like its the 25 WrestleMania It common sense just look at the wrestling website Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
So your not 17 then your really 16 by your Logicaly
There no proof to back up your clam but these is proof that these is the 25 anniversaries of Wrestlemanias —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
LOOK it simple there 25 WM event there 25 years of WM 24 was last year so why say something that not true and is wrong by saying its WM24 when its commen sense that its NOT to me it just seems pointless to put flase informations like that up Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes its Lance Strom he a prick who doesn't even like wrestling anymore beside the first WM happen March 31, 1985 This WM is happen April 5 so that why we call it WM25 because its been 25 years since March 31, 1985 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
When they add Cena to the Triple Threat Match at Mania (and they will) the Edge v Big Show (in the match listings) will need to be changed. I guarantee it will happen. (: you can tell by watching WWE this week. I'd bet anything on it. (: 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 06:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Why so argumentative? You're not saying anything people don't already know. We all know that right now, it's Show vs Edge. I was just making a point for anyone who didn't know. If you already knew, then don't respond. But don't reply with "So what?" 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 04:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Listen John Cena is not confirmed to be in a match yet verse Egde and Big Show. Stop placing this a a triple treat match! We dont know anyting yet-- Cooly123 ( talk) 20:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Nobody changed it yet. What are you complaining about? It's a mere discussion. The article says "Edge vs Big Show" so why are you moaning? 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 04:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I think that article should remove that HBK or JBL will go to WM to challenge Undetaker, i'm sure they'll ask way before hand, and there'll be build up.
Another guy to challenge Undertaker for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.139.215 ( talk) 08:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't think there should be anything about an Undertaker match until it is officially announced that he will even have a match and who the opponent will be. That would follow the protocol that applies to everything else on the wrestling articles. Wwehurricane1 ( talk) 23:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Well it's wrong because Kozlov will then challenge the winner of that match, so the article is wrong. They won't be going to Wrestlemania to challenge Taker, it will be before hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.1.87 ( talk • contribs)
Kozlov did challenge Undertaker, as the winner of tonights Raw will meet Kozlov next week on Raw.-- Mrrko ( talk) 03:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Gerweck.net has it at the following link. [1] Steveweiser ( talk) 22:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
the poster sometimes (not always, infact not even a majority of the time) shows the superstars competeing in the matches/main events. so could this be the superstars in the main events, tag matches and Money in the bank matches? Markgavin19 ( talk) 17:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
See here Super Silver 901 21:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you guys ever stop to think they are just going to call it different things but it always going to be WrestleMania 25 yes the tag line is WrestleMania 25 sliver but that not the name of the PPV
Will it be Jeff Hardy vs. Matt Hardy after Matt cost Jeff the WWE Championship. On Smackdown 4/3/09 they both have a Money in the Bank qualifing match but they both lose, on Smackdown the 13/3/09 Jeff takes Matt out, possibly leading to a Jeff vs. Matt at Wrestlemania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.174.121 ( talk) 19:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I was right Jim Ross and Tazz said breaking news Jeff vs. Matt at Wrestlemania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.174.121 ( talk) 23:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Jericho made a chalenge to Micky Rourke for a match at Wrestlemania, I think it should be noted in the Article. Alten hofen 03:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Wow, these guys are going far to make this crap look real... Like come on, Larry king???
03:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Since they started a rivalry should it be included? Boca91 ( talk)
there shouldnt be 8 contestants already figured out for the match, because jeff hardy lost out last year, plus due to recent injuries and high profile talent they might knock it back down to 6, or who knows how many and didnt discuss this on raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.120.170.5 ( talk) 14:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Just because it aired in India I don't think it should be added (yet)-- Falegas ( talk) 18:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion, Wrestlemania: 25th Anniversary is much more sutable, plus it fits it well. User: MK God —Preceding undated comment was added on 18:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC).
Not sourced, not confirmed, but Orton will be in (one of) the main event(s). He won the Rumble, and is offially in the main event. And don't try to prove me wrong, becasue; like in the discussion about money in the bank, it is most likely going to happen, but may change.
Also, In my opinion, it's gonna be DX vs rated RKO, with Shawn and HHH winning the World hevyweight championship, and WWE championship respectively, then the two of them and the undertaker fighting for the undisputed championship... Alten hofen 03:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Well if you think about that, he was in Smackdown's main event. So he probably is taking that into consideration.-- Will C 05:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put Orton in the article since he will be facing a champion a Wrestlemaina XXV and put Randy Orton vs. TBA? ThePe epShow 02:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Why is his break streak match added if it hasen't been officially anounced yet? Please remove please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falegas ( talk • contribs) 17:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
It's not on the match list yet though.-- Falegas ( talk) 15:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
It's Michaels That Takers Facing. -- KingRaven44 ( talk) 7:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Wasn't there a table last year for the Money in the Bank qualifying matches or was I hallucinating? If so, should we add it? Super Silver 901 23:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
He isn't in the match - he's facing Santino Marella tonight-- Falegas ( talk) 13:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I've made the changes to the match. Hopefully after tonight's show, we can confirm the next participant. Scca8704 ( talk) 16:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I will say that it doesn't help a whole lot to have this article protected, because I had to correct the page because someone decided to jump the gun after the Raw/ECW show in Boston. Need I have to say this again, like others have said before. If you watch the program on TV (Raw, SmackDown, ECW, etc.)in the U.S. and can verify the results on WWE.com or any other legitimate source for any other wrestling promotion, then and only then can we add it to the page. Scca8704 ( talk) 06:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Well It Was Kinda Obvious That Henry Would Win :P. KingRaven44 ( talk) 07:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Why is it that some guys have their real names next to their ringnames, and some don't? It would make sense for them all to have their real names in parentheses next to their ring names with the exception, of course, being for those who use their real name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.68.193.3 ( talk) 15:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
It's not listed under matches on wwe.com. And Vickie only announced that Big Show is the no. 1 contender. Could still be Edge vs. Show vs. Cena. Nithas ( talk) 15:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Nithas whatever your smoking stop what Vickie said basic was Big show was Number one contender for edge title at WM25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.110.223 ( talk) 23:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Falegas, you're really annoying me now TBH. Why can't you just read what i've been saying. The match was never announced on RAW, and when i wrote the first post, the match was not listed on wwe.com Nithas ( talk) 17:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Big Show was on VH1's top twenty countdown this week, and during an interview he said that the main event will be Edge VS Show VS Cena. Here's a (bad quality) link to the interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyjBTmpTmSs. Beyonce's "Single Ladies" is number 17 this week, so it is recent. Any comments?
Cc12321 (
talk)
13:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
"although, it is only the 24th anniversary. WrestleMania 2 was the first anniversary, and as a result of the continuous chronology, WrestleMania XXV is the 24th anniversary, not the 25th as WWE promotes." There no fact to back up these clam and has been proven wrong by all wrestling websites [[User:Supermike|Supermike] ( talk) 1 —Preceding undated comment added 21:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC).
It common sense that Its Wrestlemania 25 not 24 just ask a 5 year old they will know and help you Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
What are you arguing about? Quite frankly, there's no reason to argue, it's WWE's fault. So who's going to tell them. Just leave it-- Falegas ( talk) 19:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
I heard on www.wrestlezone that there has been a confirmed 25 Diva Battle Roayl. It reads "WWE will be holding a 25-Diva Battle Royal at WrestleMania 25 next month. They are currently contacting past women to be involved with the match, tying in with the 25th anniversary theme of the event" I dont know if this is true also on former wwe diva's facebook Tammy Stych it says "is getting ready to kick some DIVA ASS at Wrestlemania". I dont know if we should add it. Also i dont know how to sign stuff so i am just writing my username chrispowellathome. Sorry ppl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrispowellathome ( talk • contribs) 11:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Chris Powell sign ur posts by 4 ~ Adster 95 16:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Really I find it it a more reliable source then Wikipedia which keeps calling WM25 WM24 Infact I thinks you should Apologys to them for your slander —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Right Seriously I've had enough WM 25 is the 24th Aniversary of Wrestlemania because Wrestlemania 2 was the first anniversary of Wreslemania becuase the day you get married isn't your 1st anniversary, its a year after you get married! Adster 95 09:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Vickie Guerrero just announced on RAW that this match will take place to crown the 1st Miss WrestleMania! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.109.126 ( talk) 02:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
since this is the 24 WM why not just put the matchs from last year on here Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Wrong Its the 25 anniversary just like its the 25 WrestleMania It common sense just look at the wrestling website Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
So your not 17 then your really 16 by your Logicaly
There no proof to back up your clam but these is proof that these is the 25 anniversaries of Wrestlemanias —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
LOOK it simple there 25 WM event there 25 years of WM 24 was last year so why say something that not true and is wrong by saying its WM24 when its commen sense that its NOT to me it just seems pointless to put flase informations like that up Supermike KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes its Lance Strom he a prick who doesn't even like wrestling anymore beside the first WM happen March 31, 1985 This WM is happen April 5 so that why we call it WM25 because its been 25 years since March 31, 1985 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
When they add Cena to the Triple Threat Match at Mania (and they will) the Edge v Big Show (in the match listings) will need to be changed. I guarantee it will happen. (: you can tell by watching WWE this week. I'd bet anything on it. (: 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 06:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Why so argumentative? You're not saying anything people don't already know. We all know that right now, it's Show vs Edge. I was just making a point for anyone who didn't know. If you already knew, then don't respond. But don't reply with "So what?" 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 04:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Listen John Cena is not confirmed to be in a match yet verse Egde and Big Show. Stop placing this a a triple treat match! We dont know anyting yet-- Cooly123 ( talk) 20:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Nobody changed it yet. What are you complaining about? It's a mere discussion. The article says "Edge vs Big Show" so why are you moaning? 24.160.145.53 ( talk) 04:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)