The article confuses WUJS (World Union of Jewish Students) which the introduction discusses with the WUJS Institute which has been a separate institute for a number of years. I will continue to edit this page as WUJS and suggest that a new page be created for the WUJS Institute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.118.11.120 ( talk) 14:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
[Previous comment reviewed as per wiki policy: Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.]
I seriously question these ever expanding lists of chairpersons and awardees. I suspect they are only of interest to those named. If they are significant, shouldn't they be on the website of the organisation? Wikipedia is an enclyclopaedia, not a directory, and I don't think many or any other organisations maintain such lists on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a policy on this: 'A person is typically included in a list of people only if all the following requirements are met: The person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. The person's membership in the list's group is established by reliable sources.' WP:LISTPEOPLE These requirements are not met in this case. I propose that these lists are deleted. Jontel ( talk) 15:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article confuses WUJS (World Union of Jewish Students) which the introduction discusses with the WUJS Institute which has been a separate institute for a number of years. I will continue to edit this page as WUJS and suggest that a new page be created for the WUJS Institute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.118.11.120 ( talk) 14:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
[Previous comment reviewed as per wiki policy: Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.]
I seriously question these ever expanding lists of chairpersons and awardees. I suspect they are only of interest to those named. If they are significant, shouldn't they be on the website of the organisation? Wikipedia is an enclyclopaedia, not a directory, and I don't think many or any other organisations maintain such lists on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a policy on this: 'A person is typically included in a list of people only if all the following requirements are met: The person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement. The person's membership in the list's group is established by reliable sources.' WP:LISTPEOPLE These requirements are not met in this case. I propose that these lists are deleted. Jontel ( talk) 15:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)