This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
I thought it should be quite important to add World ORT to the Wikipedia due to is important role in world education. It is one of the biggest education centre out there.
Gadster05:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I added a brief history of ORT to the page as well as a few additional categories. It's been a significant presence on the educational scene and in jewish communities since 1880 so it seemed appropriate to flesh this entry out a bit to reflect the group's longevity. Sometime later this week, I intened to go through and fix some of the related links. In addtion, there are have been some structural changes to the national organinzations here in North America and the page was updated to reflect that.
dmnyc18:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I added information on the current and ongoing programs being worked on by World ORT and changed the external linking for the Israel section since the majority of those schools are now being overseen only by ORT Israel and not World ORT. If there isn't an ORT Israel page, possibly one should be created and those schools listed there.
dmnyc21:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Albert, Wikipedeia articles objective is verifiability, not accuarcy - see
WP:Verifiability. I'm afraid your updates have replaced sourced information with unsourced updates. We will need to go back to something closer to the old stuff until we have some more recent sourced info. Ideally we want third-party sources, but that seems hard to find about World ORT. Also, as you have had an association with World ORT, you need to be aware of the
WP:Conflict of interest policy when writing content.
Rwendland (
talk)
16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply
well, it would be closely based on it since that's where I got the information. I did ask them about using it (I spoke to the communications director as well as the national president) and they said to go ahead. Is there something else I should do to document that? Or should I rewrite it further? I am happy to do either one.
dmnyc14:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
after thinking it over, I have decided to re-edit the piece. The ORT America piece is certainly correct as far as it goes and is a good starting point but there are places where it needs fleshing out and more detail in any case.
dmnyc14:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm quite happy with that. Just wondered what was going on. I notice in the history the whole article was moved around 22 May 2007 "create temp non-copyvio version". But the article now seems quite similar to what I remember from before then. Was there a real copyvio problem earlier?
Rwendland20:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Don't know what was going on May 22 -- I didn't even know the page existed until later on. It was really quite short when I originally saw it - had only a brief summary, no history and a LOT of external links. And whoever had created it back in 2005 hadn't done anything to it in ages and ages. I can't imagine it would have had any copyvio issues. There really wasn't much to it and it didn't sound like any of the ORT's pieces I'd ever read. Still, I did notice, at that time, some outdated links and thought it was a shame the page was so sketchy so I decided to adopt the page, so to speak. I added some category links, shuffled the external links around the reflect the current structure of the organization (previous version seems to have been based on some outdated information. Then I added the history - which I took in great part from the Ort America site. Your note today gave me some motivation to actually start re-working it. So I should thank you. It needed doing.
dmnyc22:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
I thought it should be quite important to add World ORT to the Wikipedia due to is important role in world education. It is one of the biggest education centre out there.
Gadster05:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I added a brief history of ORT to the page as well as a few additional categories. It's been a significant presence on the educational scene and in jewish communities since 1880 so it seemed appropriate to flesh this entry out a bit to reflect the group's longevity. Sometime later this week, I intened to go through and fix some of the related links. In addtion, there are have been some structural changes to the national organinzations here in North America and the page was updated to reflect that.
dmnyc18:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I added information on the current and ongoing programs being worked on by World ORT and changed the external linking for the Israel section since the majority of those schools are now being overseen only by ORT Israel and not World ORT. If there isn't an ORT Israel page, possibly one should be created and those schools listed there.
dmnyc21:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Albert, Wikipedeia articles objective is verifiability, not accuarcy - see
WP:Verifiability. I'm afraid your updates have replaced sourced information with unsourced updates. We will need to go back to something closer to the old stuff until we have some more recent sourced info. Ideally we want third-party sources, but that seems hard to find about World ORT. Also, as you have had an association with World ORT, you need to be aware of the
WP:Conflict of interest policy when writing content.
Rwendland (
talk)
16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)reply
well, it would be closely based on it since that's where I got the information. I did ask them about using it (I spoke to the communications director as well as the national president) and they said to go ahead. Is there something else I should do to document that? Or should I rewrite it further? I am happy to do either one.
dmnyc14:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
after thinking it over, I have decided to re-edit the piece. The ORT America piece is certainly correct as far as it goes and is a good starting point but there are places where it needs fleshing out and more detail in any case.
dmnyc14:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm quite happy with that. Just wondered what was going on. I notice in the history the whole article was moved around 22 May 2007 "create temp non-copyvio version". But the article now seems quite similar to what I remember from before then. Was there a real copyvio problem earlier?
Rwendland20:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Don't know what was going on May 22 -- I didn't even know the page existed until later on. It was really quite short when I originally saw it - had only a brief summary, no history and a LOT of external links. And whoever had created it back in 2005 hadn't done anything to it in ages and ages. I can't imagine it would have had any copyvio issues. There really wasn't much to it and it didn't sound like any of the ORT's pieces I'd ever read. Still, I did notice, at that time, some outdated links and thought it was a shame the page was so sketchy so I decided to adopt the page, so to speak. I added some category links, shuffled the external links around the reflect the current structure of the organization (previous version seems to have been based on some outdated information. Then I added the history - which I took in great part from the Ort America site. Your note today gave me some motivation to actually start re-working it. So I should thank you. It needed doing.
dmnyc22:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply