This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a world NO-Hijab day ? 107.222.205.242 ( talk) 07:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
This page is pure propaganda and does not respect the neutrality of wikipedia 80.42.162.47 ( talk) 00:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
World Hijab Day itself is just an event and can be neutrally explained, but this page does not do so effectively. I do not feel qualified to rewrite the article, but I do agree that too much of the page focuses on reasoning for such a day rather than factual information. Zakvruwink ( talk) 19:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Now that there is a fairly good Criticism section I think the neutrality (POV) template can be removed. So I am doing that now. Oska ( talk) 06:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
world niqab day, world tudung day, world scarft day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.164.39 ( talk) 00:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Global Pink Hijab Day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.164.39 ( talk) 00:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
All verifiability concerns aside, including one specific criticism quote in an article that already consists of 50% criticism would probably be an issue of undue weight. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I saw that since I last edited this article there had been a series of bad edits and an edit war over this section of the article. I reverted to my last version and then did some fixes to the first two paragraphs because I discovered that there had been some mix-up of quote attributions within these two paragraphs. Despite people adding a 'citation needed' tag to the quote in the first paragraph the Washington Post reference had always been within the article. But at some stage it had erroneously been moved to the second paragraph and used as a reference for the wrong person (Nawaz). And some paraphrased quotes from that article had also been wrongly attributed to Nawaz. I have fixed that now. Both paragraphs could be expanded to better summarize the points made in each article but I haven't personally got the time to do that now.
So now we have three paragraphs referencing criticisms made by three different parties at different points in time. And their criticisms vary, from a criticism of the motives behind the day and interfaith support for it, to a person saying that the Hijab should be a choice, to someone campaigning strongly against the hijab. This event has been controversial since it was launched and I think it is important to illustrate the variety of criticism that it has received, as the current section does. In response to ToBeFree raising the question of undue weight (in the talk section above) I don't think that is the case. Rather, I think the rest of the article could be better filled in, e.g. reports on participation by year etc. -- Oska ( talk) 03:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Outside of the intro, the entire rest of the article is about detractors. Elainexe ( talk) 18:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
twitter search?q=%23NoHijabDay
-- Über-Blick ( talk) 22:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
General Ization: I was adding the criticisms when you reverted me. There's actually no mention of "misinformation" in the page, besides the important issue that the removed sentence was from an opinion piece. I am adding criticism from other sources. -- Mhhossein talk 03:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
“ | Asra Nomani wrote an opinion piece in The Washington Post saying the World Hijab Day event spreads the "misleading interpretation" that the head covering is always worn voluntarily, and that "hijab" purely means headscarf. | ” |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a world NO-Hijab day ? 107.222.205.242 ( talk) 07:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
This page is pure propaganda and does not respect the neutrality of wikipedia 80.42.162.47 ( talk) 00:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
World Hijab Day itself is just an event and can be neutrally explained, but this page does not do so effectively. I do not feel qualified to rewrite the article, but I do agree that too much of the page focuses on reasoning for such a day rather than factual information. Zakvruwink ( talk) 19:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Now that there is a fairly good Criticism section I think the neutrality (POV) template can be removed. So I am doing that now. Oska ( talk) 06:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
world niqab day, world tudung day, world scarft day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.164.39 ( talk) 00:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Global Pink Hijab Day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.164.39 ( talk) 00:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
All verifiability concerns aside, including one specific criticism quote in an article that already consists of 50% criticism would probably be an issue of undue weight. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I saw that since I last edited this article there had been a series of bad edits and an edit war over this section of the article. I reverted to my last version and then did some fixes to the first two paragraphs because I discovered that there had been some mix-up of quote attributions within these two paragraphs. Despite people adding a 'citation needed' tag to the quote in the first paragraph the Washington Post reference had always been within the article. But at some stage it had erroneously been moved to the second paragraph and used as a reference for the wrong person (Nawaz). And some paraphrased quotes from that article had also been wrongly attributed to Nawaz. I have fixed that now. Both paragraphs could be expanded to better summarize the points made in each article but I haven't personally got the time to do that now.
So now we have three paragraphs referencing criticisms made by three different parties at different points in time. And their criticisms vary, from a criticism of the motives behind the day and interfaith support for it, to a person saying that the Hijab should be a choice, to someone campaigning strongly against the hijab. This event has been controversial since it was launched and I think it is important to illustrate the variety of criticism that it has received, as the current section does. In response to ToBeFree raising the question of undue weight (in the talk section above) I don't think that is the case. Rather, I think the rest of the article could be better filled in, e.g. reports on participation by year etc. -- Oska ( talk) 03:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Outside of the intro, the entire rest of the article is about detractors. Elainexe ( talk) 18:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
twitter search?q=%23NoHijabDay
-- Über-Blick ( talk) 22:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
General Ization: I was adding the criticisms when you reverted me. There's actually no mention of "misinformation" in the page, besides the important issue that the removed sentence was from an opinion piece. I am adding criticism from other sources. -- Mhhossein talk 03:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
“ | Asra Nomani wrote an opinion piece in The Washington Post saying the World Hijab Day event spreads the "misleading interpretation" that the head covering is always worn voluntarily, and that "hijab" purely means headscarf. | ” |