Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Touch Of Light ( talk · contribs) 04:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply

1. Well written?: Pass - Article presents a clear, concise view of the subject matter, it flows logically.

2. Factually accurate?: Pass - Sources and references are correct, verifiable, and orderly. Strong supporting references.

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass - Complete and thorough

• Maybe too broad? Need help on this one Touch Of Light ( talk) 05:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass - Article maintains a Neutral Point of View

5. Article stability? Pass - Minor editing conflicts and different views on cover art -otherwise it is fine

6. Images?: Pass - Provides legal, correct images for many sections.

Touch Of Light ( talk) 05:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Are there any other issues you'd like to point out? No grammatical errors? Pancake ( talk) 11:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC) reply