This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: North Carolina This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance). Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by The person who loves reading, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 March 2023.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/12/13/nobody-saved-us-man-describes-childhood-in-abusive-cult.html

http://wlos.com/news/local/nobody-saved-us-man-describes-childhood-living-in-word-of-faith-fellowship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.215.112.202 ( talk) 13:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Just watched a People Magazine story about this place and it is a Cult not a church!! The story reports about mental, and physical abuse. Scary if it is being called a church; very deceiving. 2600:1700:27B0:F420:ADDC:BF4B:915B:158A ( talk) 17:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I have identified that this article has several issues. First of all, it seems that some sections are incomplete e.g. "History" not talking about the allegations and stuff. And it appears to me that the original author(s) wants to dismiss the investigations by Associated Press by overusing The Associated Press reported [...]. Perhaps the author(s) did not think that the Associated Press was reliable so they had to quote the AP every time? I think the lead could be improved as well, covering details of the allegations of abuse. 0xDEADBEEF ( T C) 12:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC) reply

0xDeadbeef I guess "original author" means me because I took a declined draft and tried to make it a worthwhile article.

Not sure what you mean by "talking about the allegations and stuff". I welcome anyone improving that.

I hadn't checked this article lately so I didn't know about your concerns. Making statements such as "The Associated Press reported" is making sure these controversial assertions are not presented in a way that makes them fact, as long as the accused are innocent until proven guilty. I just assumed that was the better approach.

And while I looked for positive coverage, I didn't find any that met Wikipedia's definition of reliable source.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply