This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Worcester-class cruiser article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agree IMHO, the stub article about Gary can't be further expanded as the ship never entered service. In addition, there's nothing in that article that cannot be said in this article dedicated to the ship's class. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 16:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Merge Nothing notable about a ship that was never built. Merge into the class article and then delete the page... JonEastham ( talk) 16:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Agree Not only was this ship never built, it never was started. Some uncompleted ships have quite interesting stories, like the battleship Kentucky and the large cruiser Hawaii, and are worth a page, but certainly not this one. Busaccsb ( talk) 03:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
This article asserts that the Juneau class was a primary design influence on the Worcester class. This is not true.
All references to the Juneau class in this article need to be appropriately revised. Any objections? Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 23:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding, but as I'm the one who inserted that assertion, I feel it's up to me to defend it. The source which is cited in the article, "American Battleships, Carriers, and Cruisers," explicitly states that the Worcester class was a derivative of the Juneau and Atlanta/Oakland classes.
If you want to insert something showing Friedman's position on the Worcesters as well, I'd be fine with that. Wandavianempire ( talk) 16:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Worcester-class cruiser article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agree IMHO, the stub article about Gary can't be further expanded as the ship never entered service. In addition, there's nothing in that article that cannot be said in this article dedicated to the ship's class. Regards, DPdH ( talk) 16:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Merge Nothing notable about a ship that was never built. Merge into the class article and then delete the page... JonEastham ( talk) 16:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Agree Not only was this ship never built, it never was started. Some uncompleted ships have quite interesting stories, like the battleship Kentucky and the large cruiser Hawaii, and are worth a page, but certainly not this one. Busaccsb ( talk) 03:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
This article asserts that the Juneau class was a primary design influence on the Worcester class. This is not true.
All references to the Juneau class in this article need to be appropriately revised. Any objections? Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 23:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding, but as I'm the one who inserted that assertion, I feel it's up to me to defend it. The source which is cited in the article, "American Battleships, Carriers, and Cruisers," explicitly states that the Worcester class was a derivative of the Juneau and Atlanta/Oakland classes.
If you want to insert something showing Friedman's position on the Worcesters as well, I'd be fine with that. Wandavianempire ( talk) 16:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)